WGA accepts agency offer to resume discussions initiated by UTA's Jay Sures – Update – Deadline

by



[ad_1]

UPDATE 20:15: A few hours after UTA Co-Chair Jay Sures contacted WGA West President David A. Goodman with a proposal on behalf of the agencies to resume negotiations with a meeting next week, Goodman replied. "Thank you for your meeting offer, which I accept on behalf of the WGA," he wrote without providing details. "We continue to believe that an agreement must be reached to align the interests of agencies with those of writers. We can not wait to hear what you have to say. "(You can read his full email under the mail.)

PREVIOUS 5:20 PM UTA co-chair Jay Sures contacted WGA West President David A. Goodman – a former UTA customer – and called for a resumption of negotiations for a new franchise agreement next week.

The e-mail, entitled "Entering the Room," was sent this afternoon. It has been shared with UTA customers and has quickly become a hot topic of conversation between agents and editors. Although the letter was personal, from Sures to Goodman, we learned that all members of the Talented Agents Association Bargaining Committee were aware of and supported the proposal of the UTA Chief.

"Many of your members have said that they want us to come back to the bargaining table. They want an agreement and they want one now, "Sures wrote. "If this dispute really concerns the packaging and production of subsidiaries, we are ready to resume the debate with you. We are open to the concepts of true revenue sharing and have already committed to the requirements of explicit customer consent, as well as overall transparency and accountability. "

Sures suggested a time and place for the two parties to meet.

"We should be by your side, fighting for the needs and merits of writers in your upcoming negotiations on AMPTP. With that in mind, let's move on to a smaller room next week and tackle ALL the questions. Our group will be there. Please try to get yours. If possible, let's organize next Wednesday at one of our previous meeting places. Many people are counting on us to get everyone working again.

If agencies and the Writers Guild meet – until now, the WGA has not responded yet – this will be the first time since April 12 that the negotiations have erupted. Previously, Sures had contacted Goodman and helped organize a last-minute meeting. negotiated a one week extension of talks before the deadline of April 6th. Additional negotiations gained ground, but made little progress on both key issues, although ATA proposed to share a small piece (0.8%) of their packaging costs with writers on bundled offers.

Here is the complete email of Sures:

Dear David-

As a long time (now a former client) UTA client, and as someone who I spoke to throughout the WGA / ATA dispute, I thought I would get closer to more to try to find a solution to this problem. disorder. It has been more than a month since we all sat next to each other at the bargaining table for what I thought was sincere bargaining in good faith.

Many of your members have said that they want us to come back to the negotiating table. They want an agreement and they want one now. Many believe that this struggle has been going on for too long with those who did not have existing jobs or global agreements feeling at a disadvantage compared to those who did. Reporting authors suffer an unfair burden. I know you have received many of these memo notes because these same notes have been passed on to me and my fellow agents with passionate calls for a new deal.

We are now at a crossroads. The complaint that your guild filed a month ago and changed this week is a reality. By law, we must respond to it and we will do it. We will be obliged to defend ourselves, to defend our reputation, our hard work and our integrity with all that we have. I know you would do the same if the roles were reversed.

We noted concerns in the areas of packaging and affiliate production and presented a comprehensive set of standards for customer representation, focused on customer choice, transparency and universally accepted standards for settlement. disputes through independent and impartial arbitration. We have never received a response to this overall proposal. If this dispute really concerns the production of packaging and affiliations, we are ready to come back to the table with you. We are open to the concepts of true revenue sharing and have already committed to the requirements of explicit customer consent, as well as overall transparency and accountability. To be clear, we have publicly stated that if a writer does not want his show to be packed, we will honor that. Let's put an end to this unnecessary and extremely costly litigation that is hurting your members and their agencies.

We should be at your side, fighting for the needs and merits of writers in your upcoming negotiations on AMPTP. With that in mind, let's move on to a smaller room next week and tackle ALL the questions. Our group will be there. Please try to get yours. If possible, let's organize next Wednesday at one of our previous meeting places. Many people are counting on us to get everyone working again. I'm waiting for your answer.

Respectfully,

Jay

Here is Goodman's answer:

Jay,

Thank you for your meeting offer I accept on behalf of the WGA. I want to clarify that we responded on April 12 to your last proposal (see attached). We continue to believe that an agreement must be reached to align the interests of agencies with those of writers. We can not wait to hear what you have to say.

Better,

David Goodman

[ad_2]

Source link