What do Ariana Grande and the Beatles have in common?



[ad_1]

It's hard to imagine an artist matching the Beatles to music charts, but that may have been inevitable as the music industry evolved. After all, it's been almost 50 years since the Beatles broke up. Many records that everyone thought would not be beaten at this time have been since then in many categories.

Yet no one would have thought that Ariana Grande would equal the number of singles among the Beatles of the 100th Billboard at a time.

She arrived there this month. It took a careful musical analysis of the music to find out how it went and whether the legacy of Grande will last another 50 years.

Three best singles on Billboard might not happen again

Here is what it is: Great figure among the three best singles on Billboard, which has not been done since 1964 with the Beatles. However, let's put this in perspective. While the Beatles occupied the top three positions of the Billboard between March and April 1964, they also occupied all five places a few weeks later.

This last scenario is still unmatched, proving that the Beatles are still the giant pillar in the history of pop / rock music. Still, you can not ignore the serious impact Ariana Grande has made on a record equivalent to the Beatles' 55 year old.

What is the strength behind his mapping to this and his legacy in the music industry? To analyze properly, we may need to make a small comparison between the Beatles and their impact on 21st century pop culture.

The songs of Grande are inscribed in the spirit of the millennial spirit

Perhaps the secret behind why Great suddenly agreed with the Beatles is how her songs look like relational therapy sessions for teens and people 20 and older.

Just look at the lyrics of the first three songs she mapped. They all deal with ruptures (like a nod to Pete Davidson) and do it in a conversational and transparent way, like a conversation with a close friend. Titles alone are written as a personal text rather than as typical song titles: 7 rings, Break with your girlfriend, I'm bored, and Thank you, next door.

Add to that the voice and vocal range of the Great. In combination, she has managed to tap into the spirit of the Millennium better than any other contemporary artist. To consider that no other artist has been able to do something similar in 55 years is more than amazing.

Similarly, the Beatles were able to tap into the deepest feelings of teenagers in 1964 still reeling from the assassination of JFK and the changing times.

The British invasion against an American including his audience

The British invasion that occurred in American music from the 1960s was essentially an antidote to the problems and growing pains that America was going through at the time. This allowed us to escape the reality of the collapse of our nation.

You could say that Grande provides a similar escape without it being from the UK or another country. His relationship with Pete Davidson sparked a lot of fascination among his fans last summer. Their breakup brought even more obsession, including how she would handle her mentally through her music.

When you look at what is happening in our country now with an avalanche of depressing new policies, Grande is making a big impression on the feelings of our youngest generation. For many, it's more than worthy of a Grammy, but not until next year.

What will be the musical legacy of Grande?

We already know that Grande is much more talented than she sometimes says. We saw her doing fantastic musical imitations on Tonight's show and can write most of his own songs.

Most pop stars are forgotten a few years after reaching their peak. At a time when things are being forgotten more quickly, we can not even guess if Grande will play again in 55 years, like the Beatles.

Anyway, when we see Rolling Stone's analysis on Thanks, next As the only song in the history of pop to promote true self-love, we could be surprised to see a whole chain of satellite music devoted to Grande. We could say that she knew her younger audience better than even the Beatles had not understood for generations.

[ad_2]

Source link