What is missing at Canon? | Fstoppers



[ad_1]

It has been about eight months since Canon launched its full frame mirrorless system. Since then, they have created or announced the delivery of 10 lenses by the end of 2019, as well as a second device. Despite the rapid progress made in the construction of the kit, it lacks an essential element to Canon.

Although the EOS R has a number of competent features, it does not rank among the market leaders in terms of sensor performance, autofocus and handling. Despite the weaknesses of the body when judged against other high-end cameras, Canon manufactures and develops high-end lenses, clearly intended for professionals and demanding users in quality. The only lenses that are even vaguely consumer oriented, in line with the new RP box, are the two mid-range zoom lenses at 24-105mm f / 4 and 24-240mm f / 4-6.3 and their 35mm macro lens .

For all consumers using R and PR, the only reasonable option for other lenses is to adapt EF or EF-S lenses. This removes any advantage inherent to the new mount. For example, the only 50mm RF fixture currently costs more than the body of the EOS R, allowing only the adaptation of the only reasonable option. RF mount lenses provide optimal performance, taking full advantage of mount distance and size, but are meaningless for current cameras, based on cost, size, or performance goals.

As it seems that the lenses and bodies of the RF mounting system take different directions, it is clear that Canon is moving towards a more professional body. When this body arrives, however, it is a mystery. According to rumors, a high-resolution sensor would be proposed, but it is not supposed to be announced before 2020, which means that the first users of the system will have waited 18 months to obtain a housing worthy of the objectives.

When the body finally comes out, users must be able to choose from a large number of mounting lenses, but considering the incongruity of the system in its current state, sales may be lacking until then.

Canon and Nikon both took aggressive pricing measures for their mirrorless systems: Canon imposed a $ 300 cashback. That it is a decrease in sales in the camera sector, a drop in price on a new category of products or an incentive from management to specify the number of its lines, it remains to be seen.

Since both Nikon and Canon have mentioned the need for higher margin products, more expensive cameras and larger lenses are clearly essential for future projects. This makes it all the more surprising the absence of a professional RF editing body. It will be interesting to see what Canon will do in the future. Was there a smooth launch of their production of RF mounts: launching objectives, while addressing body problems, firmware and goals? When the professional level RF body arrives, it will be very interesting to evaluate the Sony a7R IV and any other mirrorless ad that has appeared in the meantime.

[ad_2]

Source link