[ad_1]
I started playing video games when they switched to 3D and used CDs, which meant that the storage capacity for beautiful graphics far outweighed the hardware's ability to render them in real time. The result of this is that big budget games often do not look great while you play them, but from time to time you would be treated with a sumptuously rendered cinematic that would not only amaze you with his details and his artistic talent. but provide a crucial context for what the usual graphics should look like.
The canonical example of this is that of Square Enix Final Fantasy games for the original PlayStation. Last week, Final Fantasy VIII celebrated his 20 years while IX has been reissued for the Nintendo Switch and Xbox One – I know, VIII I was stolen – and the subject kept me in mind this week while I was playing at one of the newest, most stunning and most visually visual games of 2019. What I say, it's that AnthemThe cutscenes are really bad.
When I actually play Anthemit looks incredible. This is perhaps the most technologically advanced game on my PC monitor yet, with amazing light and motion effects that convincingly simulate the driving experience of an Iron Man suit in the world. world of Avatar. The narrative segments of the world of the hubs, meanwhile, present superbly drawn characters with excellent animation and facial animation. I can not say enough good things about the graphics of this game.
But when there is a break for a bad story, things look a lot worse. AnthemThe cinematic scenes are supposed to be epic cinematic moments describing events that go beyond the scope of the game's regular action. But they come in the form of compressed, low-resolution video files, which run to a slower frame rate. It's incredibly shocking to see a flawless 1440p game with flawless effects, then feeling pushed back to watch a movie space patrollers trailer of the Apple QuickTime website in 2003.
Anthem is far from alone in this area. I've found the same thing about most of the big budget PC games I've played in recent years, Resident Evil 2 at Far Cry 5. And look, I understand. The amount of content that goes into these scenes means that it's often impossible to render them in real time with the same resources. Recording sequences as video files allows you to play them instantly without having to load all the resources. (Although I will say that avoiding loading times does not do not seems to have been a priority with AnthemGame installation sizes continue to increase, and you can not assume everyone will be interested in the picture quality of cinematic scenes. It's also usually less noticeable if you're playing on a console with a 1080p TV.
However, the fact is that these cinematic scenes look much worse than the game itself, which seems strange considering the incredible talent AnthemVisual presentation of. Would not EA and BioWare have at least provided the option to download video files at a higher rate for people with free disk space?
Even if they did, I think it's fair to say that the era of cinematic scenes we marvel is gone. Nowadays, the games are too beautiful in real time for anything to look as improbable as, for example, this CGI sequence of Final Fantasy VIII did at the time. It was a time when, let's not forget, Pixar had just released his second film:
I do not know, maybe you had to be there. But rest. "One day, the games will be almost as beautiful as those," I thought then. "So imagine what the kinematic will be like! "
Now, of course, the games look much better than the one for which you have to be grateful. But I can not say I'm not disappointed that cinematics tend to be worse. There are some notable counter-examples, such as the impressive real-time Uncharted 4 or the anime sequences in Persona 5, but for the most part, the art of kinematics seems to die slowly.
In the end, it's for the best that we do not need pre-rendered video for our games to look amazing. I just do not think it's unreasonable to ask that the predefined video does not look worse.
[ad_2]
Source link