Whip List: Where Republicans Stand on the Urgency Vote Vote



[ad_1]

The Republicans will soon have to formally announce that they support President Trump 's emergency declaration in order to obtain more money for the construction of a wall along the US – US border. Mexican.

Democrats in the House advance with a vote Tuesday on a resolution sponsored by Representative Joaquin Castro (D-Texas) that would end the emergency declaration.

With virtually unanimous support from the Democrats, the measure should be easily passed in the House.

In the upper house, Democrats need four Republican senators to get the 51 votes needed to send the resolution to Trump's office.

Trump should veto any resolution to end his emergency declaration. Neither room should have the two-thirds needed to cancel a veto.

Here's where key Republicans stand on democratic resolution.

RECENT UPDATES: Senator Thom Tillis (N.C.).

Please send updates to [email protected].

HOUSE

YES (1)

Representative Justin Amash (Mich.)

The Michigan libertarian, a frequent critic of Trump, accused the president of trying to "circumvent our constitutional system."

"The same congressional Republicans who accompanied me in blasting the president. The executive power of Obama is now asking a king to usurp legislative powers. If your loyalty to the Constitution depends on the party that controls the White House, you're not faithful to it, "Amash tweeted.

Probably yes (1)

Representative Jaime Herrera Beutler (Wash.)

"If President Obama had already hinted that the emergency powers would be used in this way, I would have strongly expressed my opposition to this amendment, and the consistency demands that I do the same now," he said. Herrera Beutler in a statement criticizing Trump's statement. Democratic resolution during an interview with the editorial board of The Chronicle last Thursday.

"I've already said that I'm opposed [the declaration], "she says," If I can do it, when I come back [to Washington, D.C.]I will want to see what tools are available. "

UNDECIDED (8)

Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (Florida)

The Diaz-Balart office said the Florida legislator "is still reviewing the resolution."

Representative Brian Fitzpatrick (Pa.)

Fitzpatrick criticized the statement, saying "legislation must remain in the legislative branch". His office did not return a request for comment Monday on how he would vote.

Representative Mike Gallagher (Wis.)

"The problem is that the president came to Congress to ask for something, but Congress refused. So our system does not allow the chair to say, "Okay, I'll do it anyway using some sort of cheat code," Gallagher said in an interview with Milwaukee's affiliate on the NBC channel. But Gallagher did not say how he will vote on the resolution.

Rep. Will Hurd (Texas)

Hurd, a centrist, is a longer part of the Mexican border than any other member of the House. He said Trump 's emergency declaration "created a terrible precedent," but did not say he would support the resolution.

Elise Stefanik (N.Y.)

Stefanik called the emergency declaration a "bad decision" and predicted that it would be "challenged in court".

Representative Chris Stewart (Utah)

Before Trump's announcement of the emergency declaration, Stewart had issued a flash declaration: "I think President Trump is making a mistake" that "creates a dangerous precedent and puts America on a way we will regret. " When asked at a city hall last week that he would support the resolution to cancel it, Stewart replied, "I learned early: never say that you will support a bill before you read it. "

Rep. Mac Thornberry (Texas)

Thornberry, the main Republican of the Armed Forces Committee of the House, opposes the use of funds for military needs in the emergency declaration. The measure would use $ 3.6 billion for military construction. But Thornberry has not yet decided whether it would support legislation aimed at overturning Trump 's national emergency declaration.

"I have to sort out both problems and try to understand all of that," Thornberry said Thursday, according to the Wichita Falls Times Record News.

Representative Greg Walden (Ore)

"I strongly oppose any president acting outside of these explicit authorities to spend money that Congress has not appropriated for specific initiatives," said the former chairman of the House GOP campaign, which is a Democratic target in 2020, after the announcement by Trump of the emergency statement. His office did not answer when he was asked on Monday how he would vote on the Democratic resolution.

SENATE

YES (2)

Senator Susan Collins (Maine)

Collins told reporters in Maine that "if it is an unqualified disapproval resolution, I will support it".

Senator Thom Tillis (N.C.)

"I would vote for the resolution disapproving of the president's national emergency declaration, if and when it will be submitted to the Senate," Tillis wrote in an editorial published Monday in the Washington Post.

Probably yes (1)

Senator Lisa Murkowski (Alaska)

Murkowski told KTUU, a television channel from Alaska, that she would vote "probably" for the resolution, adding "if that's what I've seen right now, 39, will support the resolution of disapproval ".

UNDECIDED (11)

Senator Lamar Alexander (Tenn.)

Alexander did not say how he will vote on a resolution, but criticized Trump's decision as "useless, reckless and inconsistent with the US Constitution."

John Cornyn (Texas))

When asked if he would vote against a resolution of disapproval, Cornyn declared that he was still "considering" his "alternatives".

Senator Mike Lee (Utah)

"Congress has been giving way too much power to the executive for decades. We should use this moment as an opportunity to start taking back this power, "Lee said in a statement issued after Trump's announcement.

Senator Rand Paul (Ky.)

Trump's decision rocked Paul into a statement, saying that "the actions of the extraconstitutional executive are bad, regardless of which party makes them".

Senator Rob Portman (Ohio)

Portman declined to say how he would vote in a speech in Columbus, Ohio, but said about the wall that he "would prefer that it not be done by urgent action" .

Senator Mitt Romney (Utah)

Romney said in a statement that he wanted to evaluate Trump's statement. He added that he did not consider a national emergency as "the right approach".

Senator Marco Rubio (Fla.)

Rubio did not say how he would vote, but said in a statement shortly before Trump's announcement that "no crisis justifies violating the Constitution" and that he was "skeptical" ", he could support the actions of the president.

Senator Ben Sasse (Neb.)

Sasse told National Review that despite a "crisis" at the border, "as a constitutional conservative, I do not want a future democratic president unilaterally rewriting gun laws or climate policy ".

Senator Pat Toomey (Pa.)

Toomey told the Tribune-Review that he was "concerned" by Trump's decision but wanted to look into it.

Senator Cory Gardner (Colo.)

Gardner said in a statement to The Denver Post that he was reviewing Trump's actions but that "Congress is ideally located to fund border security." Gardner declined to comment further on Monday, saying that he had said "everything I'm going to say."

Senator Martha McSally (Arizona)

McSally told reporters in Tucson, Arizona, that she was reviewing Trump's statement and that her staff was talking to the White House.

Dorothy Mills-Gregg has contributed.

[ad_2]

Source link