[ad_1]
When costs rise, manufacturers of consumer goods look for ways to offset the increases they pay for raw materials, transportation, labor, and other expenses. In response, they usually increase the prices of existing products or reduce the size of their products, thereby increasing the unit price of what you get. These increases are then passed on to buyers through stores, who purchase products from consumer goods companies.
Consumers are sensitive to price increases, but they pay less attention to the weight of a product. While product quantities are printed on labels, not many people take the time to do the math to figure out exactly what they are paying per ounce. This means that it’s easier for a brand to squeeze into a slightly smaller box on the shelf or remove a few sheets from a roll of toilet paper than to raise prices without consumers reacting and changing. maybe branded or don’t buy the product.
A long story
The shrinkage has a long history, according to Dworsky, and has led over the years to smaller toilet paper rolls, candy bars and chip bags.
Some recent examples of products that have been lightened up, according to Dworsky: He discovered last week at a Massachusetts grocery store that the family-sized box of Cocoa Puffs had gone from 19.3 ounces to 18.1 ounces, while Cinnamon Toast Crunch had fallen by 19.3 ounces. at 18.8 ounces. The new, smaller boxes were $ 3.99, the same price as the larger boxes. This means that consumers lost a bowl of cereal when they bought the new one.
‘Flat-rate architecture’
Companies don’t often say they’re downsizing their products. Instead, they’ll say things like they’re adjusting their “price-pack architecture”. There has been a lot of talk about such changes recently with inflation on the rise and companies announcing price increases.
There is at least one company that has told its customers that it is downsizing because it is getting more expensive to manufacture.
“In order to be profitable and support our owner-farmers, we had two choices: increase the unit price per carton or reduce the carton size from 56 ounces to 48 ounces and keep the price the same,” the company said. “It was a tough decision to make, but we decided to go for the latter so that the affordable cost per carton of ice cream doesn’t change for our fans.”
Some consumer goods analysts expect companies to reduce packaging size further due to the higher costs.
Nik Modi, consumer goods analyst at RBC Capital Markets, said in an email that he expects the downsizing to be “a big move for most people. [consumer product] companies as part of their revenue growth management strategies. “
[ad_2]
Source link