Why does the media attack Meghan Markle? The real reason that will change at the birth of baby Sussex



[ad_1]

Meghan Markle has been the subject of many titles since coming into Prince Harry's life – and many of the articles written about him have been less than flattering. Why has Markle been subjected to such scrutiny and is there an end in sight?

Meghan Markle, Duchess of Sussex, attends a round table organized by the Queen's Commonwealth Trust to celebrate International Women's Day at King's College London.
Meghan Markle | Max Mumby / Indigo / Getty Images

Why articles about the Duchess of Sussex were "an attack"

Although Markle is not the first member of the royal family to be scrutinized, a royal expert believes that there is something different in the way the media cover Markle. While others have been publicly criticized, the historian Marlene Koenig, author of Descendants of Queen Victoria, told Vanity Fair that Markle's tone "is much more of an attack," noting that "it's a pile."

Vanity Fair's Michelle Ruiz explained in detail why Markle's coverage was different, noting that "the level of vitriol the biracial Duchess evoked during her pregnancy is rooted in the same systemic racism and sexism that has persevered her since she was born. she started dating Harry 2016. "

Ruiz also emphasizes "discreet nods to" black anger
stereotype of the woman ", sharing that there had been" some discomfort with
Colored woman finding a fairy tale romance. "

Maiysha Kai, editor of the fashion and beauty website Root & # 39; s, The Glow Up, spoke about the "real problem" involved in Markle's coverage: "You see it in the Meghan reports, but people do not want to talk honestly. on the real problem: they do not believe that a black woman has her place in the royal family. There is this feeling that she will never be enough.

Part of Markle's pregnancy coverage was negative

While it's a happy moment for Prince Harry and Markle, while they're expecting to receive their first baby together, according to Ruiz, the media coverage "has been dominated by negative narratives that stifle the air." 39; enthusiasm. " his little bump at BAFTA, Ruiz highlighting the title of the Express "Meghan can not stop showing off: Duchess uses these SNEAKY tricks to display his little lump.

The Markle baby shower in New York with friends has also attracted ridiculous attention, the cost of the sumptuous evening being the subject of detailed information.

Kai remarked that the shower could have been "exaggerated" compared to other members of the royal family, as they simply do not shower the baby as the Americans do, noting that the negative reaction "is also tantamount to thinking that black women do not supposed to work at this level. "

Will the media be more enjoyable at the birth of Baby Sussex?

Although Markle has had a good deal of rude stories about him in the media, a change could occur at the birth of Baby Sussex. Coryne Hall, author from a forthcoming book on Queen Victoria, thinks that the excitement aroused by the couple's first child might well make headlines more than Markle's critics.

Hall explains, "They build someone and put him on a pedestal. When they can not find anything to say, they start to make it fall. Once the baby is born, Meghan's blanket will go the other way. She will not hurt. "

It would be a refreshing change of pace. The opportunity of the arrival of Baby Sussex could very well warm the hearts of the media, who can now pass the story of the journey of the couple in a new chapter of their lives.

Hall's actions: "We'll have this pretty baby" and a reminder
this "[Meghan] makes Harry happy. "

[ad_2]

Source link