[ad_1]
Ed Valentine, editor-in-chief of BBV, sorts her mail every week and answers readers' questions. Many of the questions received have been so good that they deserve to be published separately. That's why, starting this week, Ed allows me to answer such a question in a longer message.
This week's message responds to a letter from Bruce Frazer:
If (QB Josh) Rosen is made available by the Cardinals, do you really think the giants would try an exchange for him? Looks like last year, they were not as enthusiastic about his potential compared to the rest of the QB 2018 class. The fact that he fell to number 10 indicates that other teams in need of QB could have feel the same thing. According to what has been reported, they might be able to answer the QB question until next year, when they will have the space and resources needed to get the QB that they actually wish for a much higher pool of players.
Thank you for the question, Bruce. I think there are some misconceptions here, so take your question point by point, clarify it and get an answer.
First, I really think that the potential exchange for Josh Rosen will depend on the price charged by the Cardinals (assuming they put the quarterback on the market).
If they want to insist on a first-round or even second-round pick, I do not think the Giants will act because I guess they will want to spend at least two of those three choices for defensive players.
The question now is whether the cardinals will accept a third and a third conditional turn next year, and if so, under what conditions?
In this case, I suspect that they would be do not agree to do this trade with the Giants because the third round pick of New York is well down the turn, 95th overall.
So, if you are the Giants at this point, you have to wonder if you really want Rosen, are you willing to send choice # 2 and a # 3 conditional next year?
Or do you say, "In the second round, is there a lot of value for me not to want to spend it on a player who will probably be sitting for a year?"
Personally, I think the Giants are opting for Gate # 2. If the goal is to compete this year while building, you do not want to spend the gross asset on a guy who probably will not contribute this year.
Bruce wrote:Looks like last year they [Giants] was not he excited about his[[[[RosenS]potential compared to the rest of the QB 2018 class. "
We do not really know and I think it would be wrong to start from this assumption based on the evolution of the situation last year, knowing that everyone knew what Dave Gettleman thought of Saquon Barkley.
What we make Know, from what the Giants have done, it's that Barkley has been ranked higher than any of the quarterbacks, which is why he's ranked # 2 in the general classification.
If Barkley had not been there, I think the Giants' second option would have been offensive lineman Quinton Nelson or forward Bradley Chubb.
Last point. Bruce said he was convinced that the giants could "Answer the QB question until next year, when they will have the space and resources needed to get the QB that they really wish for a good player pool. superior. "
The ceiling will have very little if anything to do with this decision. Do not forget that rookie contracts are currently controlled and are based on where a player is placed, so you are not talking about a major investment that will eat away at the ceiling.
The worst case is that the Giants extend Eli Manning to market value and then trade one of Alex Tanney or Kyle Lauletta against the new quarterback, whose hit cape should not be much higher than that of Tanney's 2020 or Lauletta.
I think it all boils down to finding the right fit at the quarterback and not forcing things. Gettleman and Shurmur worked very hard to redefine the culture in the locker room. They want professionals who hate losing (yes, it's a real thing, by the way).
I do not feel like they like men who see themselves as a "brand" who uses football to promote themselves.
They are probably looking for a candidate who wants to make Quest Diagnostics training center his second home, like Manning, for years. That's why I do not think they'll rush to make decisions.
[ad_2]
Source link