William Barr and Don McGahn: Democrats in the House Target Men of the President



[ad_1]

The House will instead vote on a motion to allow the Judiciary Committee of the House to appear in court to enforce subpoenas against McGahn, and if necessary Barr if the truce proves to be effective. short duration.

The House will move into action as Democrats intensify their attempt to reshape the political legacy of the Russian scandal by alerting the public to Robert Mueller's shocking yet complex results.

But the resolution targeting Barr and former White House legal advisor, Don McGahn, will also reflect their difficult probabilities of inflicting real political damage on Trump.

On Monday morning, on television, former Nixon White House lawyer, John Dean – a CNN contributor – told a House committee that there were parallels between the conduct of his former boss and that of Trump.

This appearance created a historic split screen featuring the older and older dean – a star witness who stated in 1973 that Richard Nixon was aware of Watergate's concealment and helped to remove the president. Yet this slice of theater and other recent developments remain incremental steps in a long and slow retaliatory move against Trump that does not seem likely to satisfy a growing Democratic minority that demands removal.

These tensions can be further fueled by the president's political defense and rapid reaction strategy, which also relies on a favorable conservative media to isolate it from its base.

In one example of his tactic, Trump tweeted an attack on "shameful" Dean, who pleaded guilty of obstructing justice at the Nixon White House, but he is now considered by many historians as an important whistleblower.

"No collusion – no obstruction! Democrats just want a victory that they will never succeed!" Trump wrote.

In what critics consider to be an even more sinister development, the Justice Department has given new details on the administration's plan to investigate the investigators who opened the FBI's investigation into the alleged links between Trump's campaign and Russia.

The investigation will be "wide ranging and multi-faceted" and will examine the behavior of US and foreign intelligence agencies, "as well as non-governmental organizations and individuals," the department wrote in a letter to the Judiciary Committee.

Barr and Nadler are both getting something

The agreement between Barr and the Speaker of the Judiciary, Jerry Nadler, offers something to both sides.

Barr, one of Trump's most controversial and powerful characters in Washington State through his handling of the Mueller report, escapes the shame of being held in contempt of Congress.

The agreement could also give the White House a strong argument against the Democratic Party's claims that it is engaged in a massive attempt to obstruct their investigations.

Nadler gets at least some of the redacted information that he was looking for, which he says he needs to act on the product of the special advice.

However, the democratic demands to see evidence of ongoing cases or grand jury documents that are supposed to remain secret remain under threat.

"I think it's good, but I do not think it fits what we want, and it's something we have to wait before we see if they'll give us more." said Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tennessee.

"And if they do not want to, we'll go further," Cohen told Brianna Keilar of CNN.

Despite the agreement, the House will vote on a resolution giving Nadler the power to apply to a federal court for subpoenas to committees against McGahn and Barr.

The White House has asked McGahn not to respond to the request for testimony as part of the investigation of the Judicial Committee on Obstruction of Justice, after invoking the privilege of the executive branch.

A huge power separation conflict is emerging as a result of the unprecedented and unprecedented claims of Trump's executive privilege, and it seems likely to trigger a fatal confrontation in the courts.

The House resolution will mark a tangible step forward for the Democratic Inquiry Strategy.

The agreement will also potentially strengthen Nadler's hand in future litigation with the Department of Justice – and will, at least for the time being, avoid the cost and the uncertain outcome of a lawsuit.

"These documents will enable us to fulfill our constitutional obligations and decide on the follow-up to be given to the charges brought against the President by the Special Council," Nadler said.

"Time is counted"

The clash around the Mueller report is only a small front in the wider effort by the Democrats to investigate and reveal the campaign, the presidency and Trump's financial life.

Pelosi, aware that it is highly unlikely that Republicans in the Senate vote to convince Trump to participate in an impeachment lawsuit, is afraid to go ahead with the impeachment.

She seeks to paint a picture of corruption, malfeasance and incompetence through House investigations that Democrats may place in front of voters to argue that Trump is not fit to a second term.

Although Pelosi has managed so far to gather most of its members behind his strategy – which currently does not include an imputation survey – discomfort reigns in his caucus.

Rep. Jamie Raskin, MP for Maryland, said Monday that the Democrats should continue the impeachment process, as Mueller had listed 10 possible cases of trump obstructions.

He said the Democrats should launch this effort in 2019 because it would be politically difficult to do so during an election year.

"The clock is turning," Raskin said.

But he added that Pelosi "is a political genius, and I will not guess his political judgment."

A new debate on the impeachment follows an escalation of the personal quarrel between Pelosi and Trump.

The president reacted angrily to reports that the president told members of the House that he would like to see him in jail rather than being dismissed.

"It's a nasty, vindictive and horrible person," said the president during an interview with Fox News last week.

Dean's appearance Monday quickly escalated into a typical political circus, often seen in House hearings, as Democrats sought to draw parallels between Nixon and Trump and the Republican president's allies railed Dean out as partial and some members even seemed to want to revive the Watergate scandal.

Dean, who had been summoned by the Democrats to offer a historical perspective, said the Mueller report offered a "road map" on impeachment, like the Watergate scandal for Nixon.

CNN's Manu Raju contributed to this report.

[ad_2]

Source link