[ad_1]
Just before Christmas, PetaPixel released its review of the M1 Macbook Pro, praising the new computer, saying it was “much more advanced than expected.” This review is not alone: In this 17.5 minute video, Linus Tech Tips finds even better performance.
Linus ran several tests and showed the M1 Macbook Air and Pro to perform extremely well, but made sure to include Geekbench as well because “that’s what all the cool kids do”. The result? Extremely impressive.
“The only processor with a hope of matching the multi-threaded performance of the M1 is a Ryzen 7, 8 cores,” he says.
Specifically for creatives, the M1 Macbooks have performed very well against the competition from Adobe Creative Cloud. Below are references in Linus’ Photoshop:
Compared to Photoshop benchmarks published in the journal PetaPixel:
Remember, PetaPixel tested the M1 Macbook Pro against an Intel MacBook Pro which cost $ 700 more and had 2x the RAM. Additionally, PetaPixel uses an older version of PugetBench that includes a photo merge test, which may explain the differences between Linus’ results and those of his review.
“Even running on Rosetta – it’s not native code – the M1 Macbooks have both managed to smoke the competition,” Linus reports. “The only potential answer to M1, at least in class, can be found in LuxMark, where the XE Graphics core of the XPS 13 shows better numbers across the board, where others are languishing at around half the performance, if not less.
Here are two more benchmarks:
Basically, in Linus’ tests, the only computer that consistently outperformed M1 Macbooks was a much thicker, beefier, and dedicated gaming laptop.
The battery life was also very impressive: it broke 20 hours of continuous use, eight hours longer than the next closest competitor. These eight hours of overtime are longer than the total duration of some laptops.
“We didn’t think he would handle it in the real world,” Linus says. “And that can’t be overstated: We’re looking at iPad-like endurance on a laptop running a full desktop operating system. You could in theory use this thing for days at a time without overdoing it, depending on what you do with it.
Anyone who doubts the performance or battery count of the Macbook Pro released here should be happy with this performance confirmation. Linus managed to get over 20 hours of battery life using optimized settings (PetaPixel didn’t use purposely optimized settings when reviewing the Macbook Pro and consistently logged almost 16 hours of battery life) and their benchmark performance is even more impressive than what has been published in PetaPixel’s review.
It’s been easy to pilot Apple for years for over-performance and under-performance, so expect performance skepticism in reviews. But with repeated reviews of how amazingly the Macbook Pro M1 is performing, maybe it’s time to accept the reality: it really is that good.
[ad_2]
Source link