[ad_1]
Earlier this month, Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes published an opinion piece in the New York Times, explaining why Facebook should be dissociated. Now, Mark Zuckerberg has responded to this article and, as you can imagine, he does not like the idea.
Sylvania HomeKit Light Strip
In the standout last week, Hughes said Facebook and Zuckerberg had "unprecedented and anti-American power." The solutions proposed by Hughes include the dissolution of Facebook and the establishment of strict government control.
As noted by CNBC, Zuckerberg commented on Hughes' comments in an interview with the French broadcaster France 2. The Facebook CEO said his main reaction to Hughes' proposal was that "what he is proposing is that we will not do anything to help."
Zuckerberg went on to say that the huge size and power of Facebook really benefits users if you "care about democracy and elections". In particular, he said that Facebook spent "billions of dollars a year" in tools to fight against electoral interference:
"If you care about democracy and elections, you'd like a company like us to invest billions of dollars a year, like us, in setting up really advanced tools to fight against corruption." 39, electoral interference.
Our budget for security this year is greater than the overall revenue of our company when we went public earlier this decade. This is largely because we have been able to build a successful business that can now support this. "
Despite Zuckerberg's claims, Facebook is under increased scrutiny from regulators. The social network is currently negotiating with the Federal Trade Commission about the Cambridge Analytica data scandal. Facebook should be fined $ 3 to $ 5 billion. Thanks to this deal, Zuckerberg himself could be held responsible for Facebook's privacy breaches.
Subscribe to 9to5Mac on YouTube for more information on Apple:
[ad_2]
Source link