[ad_1]
Former Attorney General Eric Holder warned on Saturday that the United States could face consequences if President Trump was prosecuted as a result of his presidency for allegedly violating campaign finance laws.
In an interview, CNN animator David Axelrod directly asked Holder when he thought Trump would be sued as soon as he left office.
"Well, I think there's no question about it," Holder replied.
The former Attorney General of the Obama administration took note of the guilty plea of Trump's former attorney, Michael Cohen, in 2018, when he admitted to having committed funding violations of the election campaign because of secret payments that he had organized on behalf of Trump.
"We already have an indictment in the southern district of New York where Michael Cohen [was charged] On the earnings side, Michael Cohen is already in jail for his role in this country, he said. It seems to me that the next attorney general, the next president, will have to decide.
Holder also cited court documents in the Cohen case where Trump was referenced as "Individual-1".
Axelrod then asked Holder what would be the consequences of prosecuting Trump after his presidency, if the impeachment procedure did not proceed as many Democrats want. The CNN host noted President Gerald Ford's decision to pardon Richard Nixon after his resignation.
"Yes, I think that the trial of a former president can result in a cost to the nation, and that this should at least be part of the calculation that goes into the determination that must be made by the next Attorney General" "I think we should all understand what a trial a former president would do for the country," Holder said.
"But you know, I think that in hindsight, I tend to think it was probably the right thing to do," Holder added, but he also reaffirmed his support for a indictment investigation.
"I think they should proceed with an imputation inquiry, an imputation survey," Holder said. "It does not necessarily commit you to impeach the president."
His colleague's remarks follow Thursday's vote of the House Judiciary Committee to set the rules for his imputation case, for which House Speaker Nancy Pelosi remains skeptical and up to the point. here refused to conduct the investigation as a result of a dismissal investigation.
[ad_2]
Source link