[ad_1]
Many viewers of Netflix’s new true crime documentary Night rogue about serial killer Richard Ramirez thinks the show goes too far with the bloodshed and exploitation of Ramirez’s many victims.
The four-part series necessarily involved a lot of graphic images based simply on the topic. Ramirez was ultimately found guilty of 13 counts of murder, five counts of attempted murder, 11 counts of sexual assault and 14 counts of burglary. Its victims ranged from young children to octogenarians. He attacked them with everything except the kitchen sink, using guns, knives, tourniquets, a machete, a tire iron, a hammer and his own hands.
Ramirez, who claimed to be a Satanist, was absolutely brutal in his attacks and was ultimately sentenced to 19 death sentences.
However, the new Netflix documentary, while fascinating (I watched it), seems to revel in showing crime scene photos of Ramirez’s victims with minimal censorship – something that many viewers say goes too far. away and shows little sympathy for the deceased. .
Watch the new Netflix Night Stalker series. No need for them to include the crime scene photos of the victim, and the blood spatter shots in slow motion, it is not necessary.
– Danielle Voss (@DanVoss) January 13, 2021
I agree. People love to see blood, and others will respond to it. But at some point, ethics must take precedence over viewers’ desire / money in the decisions of entertainment creators. There are, without a doubt, other killers who might be “turned on” by watching.
– Nehmo Sergheyev (@Nehmo) January 14, 2021
We started watching the Night Stalker show and I feel like it’s SOOOO exploitative. The amount of crime scene photos they use is frankly disgusting. So focused on styling
– jazz 🍔 (@ sleeper9) January 15, 2021
I am currently watching a documentary about night stalkers and have never been so scared … and how could this documentary make the families of the victims speak so kindly and loudly about the victims and that BOOM shows photos of the real photos from the crime scene ?!
– jordiXXX 🦂 (@shedesires_sin) January 15, 2021
the night stalker doc is quite problematic tbh. he grimly recycles crime scene photos of victims as if they were the opening credits of a David Fincher film rather than in real life. it’s a shame because the reporting is really good but i guess these real crime snaps need to be followed
– Thomas Hobbs (@thobbsjourno) January 14, 2021
Netflix’s NIGHT STALKER: THE HUNT FOR A SERIAL KILLER is a well-done tale of a spooky summer in LA. But unlike most real prestige crimes, it doesn’t criticize law enforcement. It also happily displays images of gruesome crime scenes on the screen.
My review: https://t.co/bSW8ac0vPh
– Eric Anders (@MrEAnders) January 12, 2021
They are not wrong. However, that’s not terribly surprising given the nature of Ramirez’s crimes.
In an interview (below) discussing the making of the documentary series, director Tiller Russell opened up about how he tried not to glorify Richard Ramirez or his crimes.
Interestingly, one of the ways Russell says they tried not to celebrate Ramirez was by not even saying his name until the police found out his identity.
[Possible spoilers below. Perfect to watch after you’ve gotten through the entire four-part series.]
[ad_2]
Source link