Google announced the end of forced arbitration for all internal affairs



[ad_1]

After Google employees from around the world stood up in protest last November, the company changed its policy of forced arbitration for sexual harassment and sexual assault only.

On Thursday, Google announced that it would end the forced arbitration for all future internal affairs.

The policy change will take effect on March 21 and will not be applied to prior disputes or settled claims.

Compulsory arbitration – a practice of the company whereby employees, upon hiring, waive their right to sue in case of disputes between employers and must resolve issues in private – was a common practice in the technology business sector, but strongly contested by Google. organizers.

In December, walkout organizers issued a letter stating that Google had not made enough progress in its policy changes.

Read more: Google's successful employee walkout organizers are now calling the rest of the technology industry to take their cause

They demanded that the company put an end to forced arbitration for all work-related cases, including cases of discrimination, and for the new policy to be extended to TVCs – the duration of the company for short- and long-term contract workers.

The group also invited employees from other high-tech companies to join their efforts.

"20,000 Googlers leaving their jobs were the first moment of a rising movement," reads the letter. "Since then, technicians from more than 15 other leading technology companies have been telling us about their experiences and we are committed to fighting together in 2019 until forced arbitration is abolished for all." our colleagues ETP and TVC. "

On Thursday, in a letter responding to Google's new policy to end any mandatory arbitration, the walkout organizers were cautiously optimistic.

"We commend the company for taking this step so that all its workers can access their civil rights through a public court," the group wrote. "We will officially celebrate these changes in our websites and / or political employment contracts."

[ad_2]

Source link