[ad_1]
If Glenn Close wins Sunday Oscars for his performance at Wife, the finalist seven times will finish his reign as the most nominated live actor without any win. (The late Peter O'Toole holds the all-time record with eight nominations.) Amy Adams, also competing this year in the high school category – Lynne Cheney in Vice– suppose the record with a sixth nomination without a win.
A victory in the Best Actress would be a justifiable and admirable conclusion to the Academy's embarrassing habit of neglecting the vigorous actress. But that should not have been long. Although Close wears the superficial film with a deep and quiet force, it's certainly not his best performance, nor even the best of the year. Her nominee named Melissa McCarthy in Can you ever forgive me? as well as the non-named Toni Collette in Hereditary and Regina Hall at Support girls tops the list of the year with singular performances that redefine the career – their version of Close Fatal attraction.
The "career Oscar" phenomenon, which aims for excellence in the career rather than the best performance of the year, is another key element of the ongoing restructuring of the Academy. In addition to the debate on popular films, broadcast times and non-broadcast categories, one central question is: do the Oscars honor the best of the year or the most beloved of the moment?
If the Oscars are here to showcase the best of the year, then Brokeback Mountain would have beaten crash in 2006 and The social network would King's speechThe crown. Classics like The great Lebowski, Girls of the dust, and The brilliant all deserved at least one nomination in their respective years. Fortunately for these films, the famous snubs often turn into a career, offering actors and directors as much respect as any victory. We must give to the forgotten crew of this year Eigth year, Burning and First reformed a little relief.
Close and Adams, the beloved couple Warren Beatty and Annette Bening and, it seems once again, Bradley Cooper direct the acting sect of cinematographic martyrdom. They are praised for continuously resisting the storm of winless rewards season, yes, but also without compromising their integrity.
Charges of wanting to win too much have been launched against many of their peers: Kate Winslet for The reader, Julianne Moore for Always alice and Leonardo DiCaprio for The ghost all had good performances in forgettable films. Anne Hathaway has notoriously faced unprecedented reactions to actively pursuing her Oscar. Of course, she deserved to win for Rachel getting marriedbut his powerful turn as Fantine Wretched should never have driven to his short-term blacklist. Unfortunately, she now counts among a different group: unprecedented actors whose legacy comes with a condescending warning.
These perceptions of winners and losers are a bit simplistic. Winning an Oscar has little to do with talent or enthusiasm, it's based on an appearance at every dinner in the industry, beeping for the media and, until recently, avoiding one of Harvey's notorious campaigns. Oscar of Harvey Weinstein.
This does not mean that there are no interesting winners. Mo'Nique in Precious, Marion Cotillard in Life in pink and all the performances of Daniel Day-Lewis deserve all their praise. But too often, other actors are removed from their best performances to pay tribute to a person previously forgotten. Al Pacino lost for The Godfather Part II then veteran actor Art Carney could win for Harry and Tonto. Pacino finally received his best actor award in 1993 for The perfume of a woman but in doing so, we have usurped the untouchable ride of Denzel Washington Malcolm X. Martin Landau wins one of the most surprising victories of all time in 1994. Ed Wood, beating Samuel L. Jackson in pulp FictionTo date, as it were, his first and only nomination.
Among the many changes that the Academy must make, in addition to attracting a younger audience and preserving their esteem, the honor is to pay tribute to actors at their peak and not at the golden age . It was a joy to see Lupita Nyong'o in 12 years of slavery or Octavia Spencer in L & # 39; s help win for master tricks at the start of their Oscar chronologies. If Spencer were forced to wait for future appointments, her 2016 candidate, Viola Davis, may have had stiffer competition for her best actress win and competitor Allison Janney could still aim for her first Oscar, that she won last year.
An anonymous voter at the Oscars said The Hollywood journalist this week, they vote for Close. Not because they loved his performance in Wifebut because they found it "wonderful" Dangerous Liaisons, a film for which she was nominated 30 years ago. "Sometimes you vote for a buildup of work, and she's a certain age, and I think that's the time," they said.
Maybe it 's time to stop waiting until the work accumulates.
[ad_2]
Source link