[ad_1]
You know what to do – mail [email protected]
Get out of this chelsea band of dramatic queens
Is it just me or is it the least friendly team in Chelsea in the last 15 years. I know everyone thinks Chelsea has always been a bunch of holes, but it's one of our holes. At each dramatic incident, my affinity for this group decreases.
Yesterday, the mailbox pointed out that giving in to the farce with Kepa made Sarri appear weak and I agree, but imagine that Conte is the boss of Chelsea, I bet he will never back down. During his press conference, he made some comments about his decision-making role. He would cash 71 million pounds of Kepa for the rest of the season. He would be sent back in the summer. Sarri treated the situation in exactly the opposite way that I suspect Conte would do it and the prognosis? Everyone says that he / she should / should be sent back in the summer.
Regardless of whether Kepa's challenge is intentional or not, the important thing is that with a revolver in your head if you had to choose the club in which this seemingly unprecedented incident would occur, you would probably have chosen Chelsea.
If Sarri gets the bag, it should be for a multitude of reasons other than this one. The Kepa incident should instead strengthen his position, as the unseemly culture of the players that seems to be implanted in the club will only be watered and treated by another dismissal of manager who, although virtually impossible in the modern game, should have been a player dismissal. .
Lawrence, CFC, Abuja
The solution
Sarri is only one way to save face. Start Kepa against Tottenham and let him out for a minute. Maybe Azpilicueta could do the same.
David O, California
Liverpool has not lost to West Ham
I strongly disagree with Dave de Galway's stark insight into Liverpool's chances of winning the championship and the fact that the draw at West Ham was "the night Liverpool lost the title" and "The night we all knew the title would not happen. "You do not know who the" us "is referring to, but many other fans of Liverpool and I are still quite happy with our position in the league.
I was at the West Ham match (sitting on the wrong side!), And although this is a depressing performance, we just scored a point at Old Trafford, in what was arguably our toughest match yet to come , and we always have a point of advance on the top of the table. We did not plant trees on Sunday and have not played well since mid-December (and we've probably struggled to tackle the threat for a good part of the season), but we're still hanging on there. ! City may be the qualified team, but I think Salah and Mane will be good, and we'll always be hard to beat with Van Dijk in the back. In addition, Oxlade-Chamberlain and Gomez have impending countdowns.
Chin up Dave – Galway is a nice town, the sun goes down a little later every night and it even makes an unusual heat!
Paul, in a rare momentum of optimism related to football, London Red
Picking holes in Johnny's utopia
I could not help to annoy myself a little more by reading The article by Johnny Nicholson on player salaries being too high. He totally failed to give an overview of the problems in the context of the most successful companies in other sectors.
Alexis Sanchez wins in eight hours. What's a nurse in Stoke needs a year to earn? It's not fair on Sanchez. The Premier League, with 20 teams (around 20-25 players per team), has about 500 players. And it's the best league in the world. 500 players. IN THE WHOLE WORLD. And when Sanchez signed his big contract, he was widely considered the best player in this group of 500 stars. The top 0.00001% of footballers in the world? Probably close.
I live in India, so I do not know much about Stoke or its health sector. I have not heard much about it, it's a bit of a goal. If the comparison was exchanged for a culinary industry, comparing Sanchez to such a nurse would compare Cristiano Ronaldo to a fryer at McDonald's (no disrespect, to any of the sections mentioned here). But you do not do that. You compare it to King Gordon F. ** Ramsay, who according to Forbes earned $ 62 million in 2018 (more than three times Sanchez's annual salary of $ 350,000 a week). The best are recognized for what they are and for what they contribute and inspire to the rest of us.
All this before taking into account that nurses, like teachers and those of us who serve our governments, make an informed choice – they realize that their priorities are to serve society and personal fulfillment and professional who accompanies him. It was a choice they made and it was looking for another dream. And we benefit and we are grateful.
But Sanchez also made a choice. While we were 13 and 14 or even 16 years old, jumping rocks and smoking cigarettes after school, at that age he was probably barefoot, was training hard and was running himself in tatters in pursuit of his dream of football. We only see footballers such as they are now – superstars in their expensive kits and hairstyles. They probably had to face an extremely difficult journey. A hard journey without a guarantee of success – in fact, a VERY LOW PROBABILITY of success. He continued despite everything. Risk vs reward? Look here. The fact is that these players have a small window (15 years old maximum?) Where they are rewarded with outrageous salaries for their work during this period, but also to bet on themselves and work for that person. another did not dare.
Even if we want to believe that footballers only play for the love of football, the money encourages players around the world to embark on football. It's a career after all. Sadio Mane would have fled to Dakar (and would it have been allowed to stay) in Senegal if there was no treasure pot at the end of the rainbow? There will always be exceptions – the Peles and the Maradonas – but would we have found Yaya Toure? Or Auba? Or Drogba? Or Sanchez? It may not be a coincidence that in 1980 (the year cited by Johnny Nic), there were almost no foreign players in the league. With money came the opportunity. And it's great!
Yesterday, I read that Diogo Dalot, 18, was spending his first salary at Man Utd to buy a new school bus for the little boys from his football academy at his home. Think of the inspiration that it is now for these kids – could they follow in his footsteps? Sure. Would it be great for them and for us as fans? Sure. Could Diogo have done it if the highest wages were capped at 200k / year? Not a snowball.
My point is that football players, especially those of the Prem, deserve outrageous salaries for their outrageous feats. How scandalous? Nobody knows – certainly not those of us who have not yet reached the same level of achievement. 150k / year might suit some of us, but that's what a senior executive in a big London company would bring home. This is what the best players in the world deserve? It's a joke.
Do not ask for documentation – every major club is already doing a great job for society through its foundations – let's take inspiration from those who have done what we have not done yet. And let's take advantage of it.
Madhav (it's too long – not at all, it'll be up, but I had to say it!) LFC
… Your solution to paying footballers to the market is to immediately introduce the Cuban compensation model according to which 80% of the population of this island bequeathed gains about 100 pounds per month, in the interest of as many people as possible. you feel that you meet their needs. Highly qualified doctors are lucky if they earn 1.5 times more.
The problem with your model is that almost all sports leagues have experienced the same trends. In Europe, we can of course talk about the Messi and Ronaldo contracts. In China, Oscar earns 400,000 pounds a week. The Vikings pay Kirk Cousins a mediocre quarter of $ 28 million a year, or about $ 1.2 million per game if they complete the Superbowl. Manny Machado, a talented but imperfect baseball player, has signed a 10-year contract with the Padres for a budget of $ 30 million a year. Stephen Curry, an outstanding basketball player, earns $ 40 million a year. Players do not consider the amount they receive based on what they need to meet their limited needs, but they take this into account in assessing the importance of their talents. That's why you're going to hear some players say that they want to be the best paid, this or that, not because they need money, but because it sends a message about how good they are.
So, I guess if an EPL player decides not to be paid as the market demands, he will just relocate to Europe or China. Unless of course Mr. Nicholson can not convince the owners of the many teams in China to pay each player what he tells them.
So why should British players who support a world television audience of between 100 million and 150 million and who bring billions of pounds to television networks should be content with each according to his abilities, each according to his needs. (Karl Marx)
And perhaps we should apply the same logic to football journalists.
JH Aruba
… Personally, I have the impression that the best footballers deserve the money that they earn the most often.
Most often, they come from the working class and may even come from poorer countries, they have worked very hard to achieve this and have had to overcome all the difficulties to be chosen, often with few prospects for the future. Even the worst footballers we see in the EPL were probably scholars from the hometown in which they grew up and were probably working very hard to get to where they were. The path to where they are is difficult. Most of the time, they have inherited nothing, or even benefited, but only from dreamy children working hard to achieve it.
They play the most popular sport in the world in an extremely competitive field, often in top form, as they are seen and harassed by millions of people who make mistakes, and a good player to another does not. should not be allowed to hit the ball. armchairs on Twitter.
Do they have more than enough to live comfortably? Yes, but many of us, as part of our regular jobs, are using all our potential to get money from our employers, be it unions or other job offers. Footballers earn a lot, but they do what reasonably human beings do and give a lot of what we would do when negotiating our salaries. Yes, many people in the world suffer and work hard and are not paid as much, but that does not mean that we punish those who have had the chance to do so and who have been lucky.
Remember that most of these children have not been spoiled and have been spoon fed. They have found a job that few people can do.
If you think that the price of high level football is not worth it, as John Nic suggested, you should not buy it. Seriously, his football and as long as it is great, it is not food, water or medicine. Vote with your wallet.
Yaru, Malaysia
… John Nicholson, still committed, deplores the high salaries of footballers and he is perfectly entitled to do so. However, any analysis of the situation is incomplete unless you know what to do with the money that remains after the players' salary limitation. The amount of revenue earned by the club through sponsorship, circulation, tickets, etc. is determined by the market (more or less) free. It just seems to allow players to participate in the same system and extract the wages that the football market will support. Otherwise, it will simply mean that even larger sums will go to the owners. If Johnny thinks the players are rich enough, it is certain that this criticism can also be addressed to the owners.
Cameron, Toronto
… I'm a little late to answer John Nic's column on footballers' salaries, but maybe you can insert another answer.
It's been almost two decades since I read John's work and feel that I grew up thanks to his unique entertaining blend of social ethics and frankly entertaining and obscene behavior in early adulthood, if you Permit me not to say it.
However, I simply do not agree with most of his remarks, with the exception perhaps of some of the last paragraphs. It's partly because I've grown up a bit and my personal politics has shifted from centrist to centrist (go Tiggers!), But also because, paradoxically, unless the entire global economic system does change, limit player wages reduces the empowerment of workers. In the current football model, football players are blue-collar, as well as shareholders, shareholders, board of directors, sponsors and even agents who represent the executive class I.e. white-collar workers.
I would much rather see footballers get huge pay raises than the ruling class. What is wrong with young people often from the most disadvantaged backgrounds in the UK and around the world, who have made Herculean efforts and promise to earn astronomical salaries? Let them take their cake and eat it, I would prefer them to the board members who did not have skin in the game except their own job. That would only further widen the equality gap and we can all say it's a bad thing.
I also question all studies that say happiness is lost at £ 57,000. For those who live in the south of England with kids and a mortgage, it's really not a huge paycheck and I'm sorry of course if it sounds right or greedy.
What I want to say above all is that football clubs should be considered as the national institutions they are and, as it says in the last paragraph of John, should be used as a way to improve the community . This could be done through a variety of methods that, I am sure, are better known than I might suggest, but perhaps involve some tax breaks on players' salaries so that clubs do not lose their advantage. competitive, as well as an investment fund for football mandated by the government. it gives powers at the ministerial level to ensure that part of the money is allocated to community projects. If successful, you may even see other governments whose economies are struggling, but with popular football clubs (Spain / Italy?), Milk their own cows (and why not, at least public treasury) for the benefit of the community.
Samwise, MUFC
Find comfort in the championship
I'm about to leave Sky. I do not feel like I'm getting my money's worth and I'm tired of the endless money around football, like an immoral black hole that sucks up money for hard-working people who earn less and earn less. That's all that's left of shit: here's a new movie, pay over £ 10 in addition to your already ridiculous subscription.
Sunday's mega clashes helped. Back home at 1357, just in time to settle for the biggest English football game. As a fan of Arsenal, I had not invested anything in either team, apart from not liking Liverpool. But if they had won, I would not have cast a spell – all I wanted was a decent game. Well, we got a huge pile of stinky stinks that was embarrassing: Liverpool was more than Utd because Utd had some extenuating reasons (although several muscle injuries in one half = the needs of the medical department were examined). Liverpool was just horrible. Shocking.
Then Chelsea vs City. A little more entertaining, but it was not difficult. Arrizabalaga and his apparent discontent with his superior's authority were the most "entertaining".
So 210 minutes of football "prime" but not a goal. Barely even near a goal. Worse than that, the quality presented – especially in the Nordic competition – was diabolical.
Tonight I came home from work, took my curry in the microwave and saw Forest v Derby. So I'm here, 37 minutes and much more amused (slightly betrayed by sending this while it's running) by this East Midlands derby compared to any of the TV shits served yesterday. 'Pashun' in abundance, no bad quality, Cole recounting his 38 years. Two teams face each other to score points at the top of English football: the Premier League.
Give me this championship game a day more than the overpayment (Johnny Nic – as in his article, not the man himself) – underperforming and complacent wankers that show up for current holders of the Premier League week after week.
I realize that my speech has only little conclusion. I'm still upset after England lost their rugby on Saturday and I was hoping that good football on Sunday, given by four of the best English football teams, would be useful. But it turns out that two former titans who peddle their trade in the second tier of England reestablish the idea that competitiveness in football is always a thing.
Andrew Lampard
Pray for Chugger
I am so emotionally invested The story of Geezers, I let out a sigh of audible relief from three desks in the draw (which alerted spoiler) that would finally give Chugger a well deserved respite. If it broke down, I … I do not know what I would do.
Kennedy Bakircioglu can go himself ****.
Seriously; This is the best series on your site since the Neviller newspapers. Good work!
Chris Bridgeman, Kingston upon Thames
[ad_2]
Source link