[ad_1]
COngress loves ignoring presidential budget demands and this year lawmakers are even more anxious to reject President Trump's spending plan.
"For all the years I've been here, no president's budget has been passed as it's been introduced, and I do not think it will be any different," said Senator Susan Collins, R -Maine, left the Senate Monday night.
The White House handed the document to Capitol Hill just days before the Senate blamed the president for unilaterally reallocating money earmarked for military projects to building a border wall to the south.
The president's $ 4.5 billion budget provides for a 5% cut in domestic spending and more than $ 8.6 billion for border security and physical barriers along the southwestern border.
The budget is not a strategist with the Democrats, but the Senate GOP is not enthusiastic either. This is because the proposal would require deep spending cuts in almost every department except Defense, Homeland Security and Veterans Affairs.
"Most of the president's budgets, and I have been here for quite some time, are mainly suggestions," said Senate Speaker in charge of Supply Richard Shelby, R-Ala., Who will lead the future spending law. the upper house. "You know, we watch them. But I do not know any of those promulgated. "
Shelby said that part of the border security funding that will be added to the fiscal year 2020 budget will have to be used to replenish Trump's $ 3.6 billion budget on the military construction budget of a border wall subject to a national emergency, he said. February.
The Senate is about to vote to revoke the national emergency on Wednesday, but that will not stop Trump from redirecting funds. Trump said he would veto this measure and that there would not be enough opposition from the GOP to override his veto.
Trump's unilateral spending move may dampen the group's enthusiasm for fighting Trump's border security funding demand in upcoming spending discussions.
Shelby would not guarantee that the government will seek the same level of border security funding in the fiscal year 2020 spending legislation.
"I'm going to try to work with him," Shelby told Washington Examiner. "But let's see what we can do."
Republicans inherited Monday proposed spending cuts. Collins has described the removal of more than 31% of the Environmental Protection Agency's "deep".
Senator Pat Roberts, R-Kan., Chair of the Senate Committee on Agriculture, was not happy with the 15% budget cut in agricultural programs, which could have an impact on Five-year law on the authorization of agricultural programs.
"The proposal is a proposal," said Roberts.
[ad_2]
Source link