[ad_1]
"It is important to study health policy in a more quantitative way, and I think we are witnessing an increasing number of research studies on this type of topic," he said. "This research is in a way consistent with the growing trend of research in this area."
The new research is preliminary and is still in its infancy, but it comes because the Trump administration seems to be redoubling its efforts to try to overthrow Obamacare.
The new research included mortality data for adults aged 45 to 64, from 2010 to 2016, in all states except Massachusetts and Wisconsin. In these two states, the Medicaid extension was not linked to the ACA.
The researchers looked closely at the differences between states with respect to cardiovascular disease-related deaths at the county level, before and after the Medicaid expansion.
They adjusted these differences for factors that could distort outcomes, such as the unemployment rate, the median household income, and the number of cardiologists per 100,000 population.
The researchers found that, compared to counties in non-expansive states, expansive state counties showed a greater increase in health insurance coverage for low-income residents and a much smaller increase in cardiovascular mortality rates. .
Between 2010 and 2016, deaths from cardiovascular disease increased from 141.9 to 142 per 100,000 population each year in expanding state counties, while deaths from cardiovascular disease increased from 176.1 to 180, 6 per year in non-expanding states counties, the data showed.
Research had some limitations. As this was an observation, the researchers were not able to fully disentangle the factors that could have affected the differences between the counties, whether expanding or not.
"The expansion of Medicaid was the main health policy implemented in 2014, but our study did not take into account some other elements, or those that occurred at about the same time, that could potentially explain some of these conclusions, "said Khatana. I said.
"Another [limitation] is that we looked at cardiovascular disease as a whole, so we grouped everything together: heart attack, stroke, arrhythmia, etc. Because a cause of death causes very few deaths in different countries, which was our level of analysis, we are not able to say which disease is responsible for these changes, "he said. declared.
"This study is very much in this direction," said Benjamin, adding that more research needed to be done to confirm the correlation between reducing the number of deaths from cardiovascular disease. and the expansion of Medicaid is truly determined by the ACA and not by any other factors.
This finding was based on a review of 77 studies previously published on Medicaid, but only 16 studies focused on quality of care and health outcomes.
"The Medicaid expansion had taken place a few years ago, it was too early for studies to reliably determine its effect on clinical measures of health status and certainly too early to determine its impact. on the long-term results, "Mazurenko said. I said.
"It is important to note that none of the few published published studies report poorer results due to the expansion of Medicaid," she said. "With more time, researchers will have the opportunity to further determine the effects of Medicaid's expansion on the health of the population."
"So that's our position, so the next question is, how much does it cost?" he said. "What benefit will we have in ensuring that people can afford affordable insurance?" What is the value? And what these data help to provide in this conversation is that "Yes, it's important." ""
[ad_2]
Source link