[ad_1]
You know how annoying it is to walk down the street and have someone lurking right in front of you, as if they do not care in the world.
For example, you are in a hurry to get to work or just walk at a normal pace to get to work. nowhere and this person will only remember you for a reason other than the fact that they are in slow AF mode.
Well, now jokes about them because research has shown that fast walkers live up to 15 years older than people who hang out. 15 whole years! They do not laugh, huh.
The research, conducted by a team from the University of Leicester, analyzed data from 474,919 people aged 52 years on average in the United Kingdom between 2006 and 2016.
The team found that regardless of their weight, people who usually walked very fast have a long life expectancy – from underweight to morbid obesity.
Women who walked fast had a life expectancy of 86.7 to 87.8 years, while those who walked more slowly had a life expectancy of 72.4. The life expectancy of men has fallen again; from 85.2 to 86.8 years at a rapid pace to only 64.8 years for slow walkers.
This is the first time that research has combined a rapid pace of walking with longer life expectancy, regardless of body weight or obesity.
Professor Tom Yates, lead author of the University of Leicester study, said in a statement:
Our results could help clarify the relative importance of fitness versus body weight on the life expectancy of individuals.
In other words, the results suggest that fitness is perhaps a better indicator of life expectancy than body mass index (BMI), and that it encourages population to walk quickly can add years to his life.
The research took data from the British biobank and was analyzed by the National Institute for Health Research, Leicester Hospitals and the Universities of Leicester and Loughborough.
Dr. Francesco Zaccardi, clinical epidemiologist at Leicester Diabetes Center and co-author of the study, said:
Studies published to date have mainly shown the impact of body weight and physical fitness on mortality in terms of relative risk, for example a 20% relative increase in the risk of death for each increase in 5 kg per square meter, compared to a reference value of a BMI of 25 kilograms per square meter (the threshold of BMI between normal weight and overweight).
However, it is not always easy to interpret a "relative risk". In contrast, life expectancy ratios are easier to interpret and give a better idea of the separate and joint importance of body mass index and fitness.
Good guys, that's all. I want you all to take a break and make a brisk walk immediately.
No excuse, science is science.
If you want to tell a story, send it to UNILAD via [email protected]
Lucy Connolly
Graduated from a master's degree in audiovisual journalism and a NCTJ graduate in level 3 journalism, Lucy worked at ITV, BBC Inside Out and Key 103. During her journalism work at UNILAD, Lucy covered many news stories while writing reports on mental health, awareness of cervical cancer screening and Little Mix (for whom she is obsessed flawlessly).
[ad_2]
Source link