[ad_1]
The chairman of the House's Intelligence Committee, Adam Schiff, said that if Attorney General William Barr did not make the full report of the special advocate, his committee could call this one to testify of his conclusions.
"We will get to the bottom of things," Schiff told "This Week". "We will share this information with the public."
"Well, we will obviously summon the report, we will bring Bob Mueller to Congress, we will sue him if necessary," said Schiff. "And in the end, I think the department understands that they're going to have to make it public, and I think Barr will understand that as well."
Schiff warned Barr that he was trying to "withhold, to try to bury part of this report, it would be his legacy and it would be a tarnished legacy".
"So I think the pressure will be immense not only on the ministry, but also on the Attorney General," he said.
STEPHANOPOULOS: As you know, William Barr may have a very different view of what these regulations require. They could allow him to publish the entire report, but according to the Justice Department's regulations, officials said that if you refuse to sue someone, the underlying evidence should not be disclosed.
SCHIFF: But George, the department has repeatedly and repeatedly violated this policy, as you know, to a large extent in the last two years. And in fact, I had this conversation with Rod Rosenstein and other people from the Department of Justice when they had handed out thousands and thousands of pages of discovery in the Clinton inquiry by email and he There was no indictment in this investigation. a new precedent that they were creating and that they would have to respect this precedent, that it is about a congress controlled by the democrats or the republicans.
So, they will have to respect that. And I also think that, regardless of the precedent they have already created, the public absolutely must know, which, in my opinion, overrides any other consideration.
STEPHANOPOULOS: You say that the Ministry of Justice will have to respect this precedent, but that if it does not do it? And if they refuse, we will not disclose the underlying evidence. What options do you have?
SCHIFF: We will obviously summon the report, we will bring Bob Mueller before the Congress, we will bring him to court if necessary. And in the end, I think the department understands that they will have to make it public. I think Barr will finally understand that too. Barr enters this job with two strikes against him. He applied for the position with bias against the Mueller investigation. That's partly why he was hired. In addition, he did not want to commit to following the advice of lawyers specializing in ethics. Indeed, that was part of the reason he was hired.
If he was trying to restrain, to try to bury any part of this report, it would be his legacy and it would be a tarnished legacy. So I think there will be tremendous pressure not only on the department, but also on the Attorney General.
STEPHANOPOULOS: You talk about public pressure. Are you ready to sue the administration?
SCHIFF: Absolutely. We will get to the bottom of things. We will share this information with the public and if the President is serious about all his requests for exemption, he should welcome the publication of this report.
STEPHANOPOULOS: As I said, the president reiterated that there was no collusion. You said several months ago that you have already developed evidence of collusion. We have not seen that of Robert Mueller. Do you have any proof of the connivance of the president?
SCHIFF: George, there is plenty of evidence of campaign collusion and this is largely recorded in public records. This summarizes all we have seen recently about Paul Manafort's meeting with someone related to Russian intelligence and survey data sharing, not key data. That's not why we think Trump will win data, but raw data, complicated data. We have seen evidence that Roger Stone was in communication with Wikileaks. We saw the president's son hold a secret meeting at Trump Tower as part of the Russian government's efforts to help the Trump campaign. He accepted this help. , his interest in getting that.
All this is evidence of collusion and there are many, many more. If this will be a criminal plot that can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, we will have to wait for Bob Mueller to tell us. But to – not see what is clearly in front of us means to you – you basically do not want to see the evidence of collusion because it is quite abundant.
[ad_2]
Source link