[ad_1]
Although federal regulators have not endorsed vaping as a smoking cessation aid, some consider it a vital strategy for smokers attempting to quit smoking.
Testimonies of people who managed to switch from fuel to vaping tobacco "
" If it was not for vaping, I would have died while smoking cigarettes. Vaping has given me the opportunity to live longer and enjoy my children, "reads one of these testimonials
The claims are not entirely unjustified.
Some research supports the use of vaping as a smoking cessation aid. Such a study published in The BMJ shows a strong correlation between vaping and smoking cessation – for at least three months
But the overall research has conflicting results.
A European study of 2017 concluded that vaping does help people quit smoking. Instead, the researchers said, it is likely that these individuals will become "dual users".
And now, a new study published in PLOS One argues that vaping helps almost no one stop smoking
. 850 people selected from GfK Global's KnowledgePanel participated in the observational study and a follow-up interview
The survey results showed that 90% of smokers who smoked beginning of the study were still smoking a year later
. The study builds on previous research that suggested that vaping helps people stop or reduce smoking for a period of three months.
Although vaping may promote smoking cessation in the short term, the results of this new study suggest an inefficient long-term strategy.
Previous studies have also drawn similar conclusions
The new study also develops what we know about addictions.
The use of a different method of nicotine consumption is not effective – or necessarily safer than completely changing the behavior.
The study suggests that behavioral therapy and alternative interventions should be considered in withdrawal plans to increase cessation success.
Which advocates, experts have to say
Conley, a lawyer and the president of the American Vaping Association, spoke with Healthline about his concerns regarding the study.
Conley cited the limitations of the study – including selection bias – as a reason for being skeptical
. Because subjects were not necessarily daily users of vape throughout the year, the results of the study are debatable.
"You would never see these same researchers launching a study that begins with people who have been using nicotine gum for three months – still smoking – where are they a year later compared to the rest of the population?" he asked.
"How is it useful for someone to use the nicotine patch or eraser on one or two days a month? A year later, are we going to blame the eraser for it to be not without smoke? ", he added.
Conley also said that he was concerned that this kind of research could deter smokers from using vaping as a weaning tool. It is not surprising that when smokers are constantly affected by these views, on electronic cigarettes that do not recognize the relative risk at all, some smokers conclude that there is no interest in making [a] "When this thing could kill me as quickly as smoking," he said.
Conley went on to say that despite the perceived flaws in the study, the results are really positive for the vaping advocacy community. There was a problematic study that no one would expect to see with the results of this study, but even then, 10% of basic e-cigarette users ended up smoke-free a year later. " , he said. "This is not a bad number at all when you consider that it is a group that has already failed, if that was its intention with e-cigarettes."
Healthline also spoke with Chris Bostic, Deputy Director of Policy at Action on Smoking and Health (ASH).
"The study itself seems valid," Bostic said.
He suggested that further studies are needed to make appropriate regulatory and regulatory decisions on electronic cigarettes. I do not know all the misdeeds caused by e-cigarettes. It's possible that it's the same thing as cigarettes, but less. But it is also possible that they add new harms, "Bostic said.
"We are a little tired of e-cigarettes because nicotine addiction itself is harmful," he added. "It's a disease, according to medical health professionals.On the other hand, of course, if it helps people not to smoke fuel, they should do it, but this study seems to indicate that this is not a very big role.This is not an important role to help people quit and it's important information to know for those trying to sort these things out . "
ASH has not yet taken a stand on electronic cigarettes, but Bostic personally recommends Spraying as a weaning tool.
" On a personal level, I recommend, of course, if you can not not stop in another way, so use electronic cigarettes, "he said." But of course, most people, show studies, do not do it. And most people will use electronic cigarettes that used to smoke and that also continue to smoke, so there is no positive health impact because cigarettes damage health very early. "
The problem, again, is about relative risk and the potential for individuals to become dual users."
"I do not know everything about electronic cigarettes," noted Bostic, "but I would be stunned to discover that they are like, or more, "
" We are concerned that continued resentment within the public health community with regard to electronic cigarettes is slowing our approach to getting rid of what kills everybody, namely the combustible tobacco ". ] [ad_2]
Source link
