90 percent of smokers in the study were unable to quit after one year



[ad_1]

The debate continues to question whether the use of electronic cigarettes can help you quit smoking tobacco products.

Although federal authorities have not endorsed vaping as a smoking cessation aid, some consider it a life-saving strategy.

The stories of people who managed to switch from fuel to vaping tobacco are emotionally charged.

"If it was not vaping, I would have died while smoking cigarettes. Vaping has given me the opportunity to live longer and enjoy my children, "reads one of these testimonials

The claims are not entirely unjustified.

Some research supports the use of vaping as a smoking cessation aid. Such a study published in The BMJ shows a strong correlation between vaping and smoking cessation – for at least three months.

But the overall research has conflicting results.

A European study of 2017 concluded that help people quit. Instead, the researchers said, it is likely that these individuals will become "dual users".

And now, a new study published in PLOS One claims that vaping helps almost no one stop smoking

. 850 people selected from GfK Global's KnowledgePanel participated in the observation study and a follow-up interview

The results of the survey showed that 90% of smokers who smoked at the beginning of the study were still smoking a year later

. The study builds on previous research that suggested that vaping helps people stop or reduce smoking for a period of three months.

While vaping may help promote smoking cessation in the short term, the new study strongly suggests an ineffective long-term strategy

Previous studies have also drawn similar conclusions

The new study also develops this that we know about addictions.

The use of a different method of nicotine consumption is not effective – or necessarily safer than to completely change the behavior.

The study suggests that behavioral therapy and alternative interventions should be considered in withdrawal plans to increase cessation success.

Which advocates, experts have to say

Conley, a lawyer and the president of the American Vaping Association, spoke with Healthline about his concerns regarding the study.

Conley cited the limitations of the study – including selection bias – as a reason for being skeptical

. Since subjects were not necessarily daily users of vape throughout the year, the results of the study are debatable.

"You would never see these same researchers launching a study that starts with people who have been using nicotine gum for three months – still smoking – where are they a year later compared to the rest of the population?" he asked.

"How is it useful for someone to use the nicotine patch or eraser on one or two days a month? A year later, are we going to blame the eraser for it to be not without smoke? ", he added.

Conley also said that he was concerned that this type of research could deter smokers from using vaping as a weaning tool. It is not surprising that when smokers are constantly affected by these views, on electronic cigarettes that do not recognize the relative risk at all, some smokers conclude that there is no interest in making sure that [a] When this thing could kill me as quickly as smoking, he said:

Conley went on to badert that despite the perceived flaws of the study, the results are in made positive for the vapor defense community

. There was a problematic study that no one would expect to see with the results of this study, but even then, 10% of basic e-cigarette users ended up smoke-free a year later. " , he said. "This is not a bad number at all when you consider that it is a group that has already failed, if that was its intention with e-cigarettes."

Healthline also spoke with Chris Bostic, Deputy Director of Policy at Action on Smoking and Health (ASH)

"The study itself seems valid," Bostic said.

He suggested that further studies are needed to make appropriate decisions about electronic cigarettes. I do not know all the misdeeds caused by e-cigarettes. It's possible that it's the same thing as cigarettes, but less. But it is also possible that they add new harms, "Bostic said.

"We are a little tired of e-cigarettes because nicotine addiction itself is harmful," he added. "It's a disease, according to medical health professionals.On the other hand, of course, if it helps people not to smoke fuel, they should do it, but this study seems to indicate that this is not a very big role.This is not a big role to help people quit and it's important information to know for those trying to sort these things out . "

ASH has not yet taken a stand on electronic cigarettes, but Bostic personally recommends" As an individual, I would recommend, of course, if you can not quit smoking otherwise, then use electronic cigarettes He said. "But of course, most people, show studies, do not do it. And most people will use electronic cigarettes that used to smoke and that also continue to smoke, so there is no positive health impact because cigarettes damage health very early. "

The problem, again, is the relative risk and the potential for individuals to become dual users."

"I do not know everything about electronic cigarettes," noted Bostic, "but I would be stunned to discover that they are as, or more, dangerous than combustible tobacco. "

" We are concerned that continuing resentment within the public health community over electronic cigarettes is slowing our approach to getting rid of what kills everyone, which is combustible tobacco. "] [ad_2]
Source link