[ad_1]
The display shows a facial recognition system for law enforcement at the NVIDIA GPU Technology Conference in 2017 in Washington
Unique Features your face can allow you to unlock your new iPhone, access your bank account or even smile.
The same technology, using algorithms generated by a facial scan, may allow the police to find a wanted person in a crowd or to match the image of a person in custody to a database of known offenders. Facial recognition came into play last month when a suspect arrested for a shootout in a newsroom in Annapolis, Maryland refused to cooperate with the police and could not be immediately identified
"We would have had a lot more time to identify it and be able to advance the investigation without this system," said Timothy Altomare, chief of police for the county. Anne Arundel
.
While most observers recognize the merits of some uses of this biometric identification, the technology evokes fears of a "Big Brother" surveillance status
. these concerns are studies showing that facial recognition is not always accurate, especially for people of color.
A 2016 Georgetown University study found that one in two US adults, or 117 million people, are in facial recognition databases. These systems can be viewed.
A growing fear for civil liberties activists is that law enforcement agencies will deploy facial recognition in real time through drones, cams, etc. "The real concern is police on patrol that identifies at will law-abiding Americans with body cameras, "said Matthew Feeney, Emerging Technologies Specialist at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank
." This technology enhances of course but it It's not as accurate as sci-fi movies would make you think. "
-" Aggressive "deployments & # 39; –
A Chinese police officer in Zhengzhou in the central province of Henan in China wearing high-tech sunglbades who can spot suspects in a crowded station, the latest use of facial recognition that has sparked concern among human rights groups
China is in the forefront of facial recognition. with at least one arrest of a criminal suspect.
Clare Garvie, lead author of the Georgetown 2016 study, said that over the past two years, "facial recognition has been deployed more widely and aggressively" in the United States, The fact that Amazon has started deploying its Rekognition software in the police has sparked a wave of protests from employees and activists who have called on the tech giant not to use law enforcement [19659007]. Amazon is one of the dozens of technology companies involved in facial recognition. Microsoft uses for example facial recognition for US border security, and the US state of Maryland uses technology from Cognitec and the Japanese technology company NEC.
Amazon maintains that it does not monitor and apply none The tech giant also claims that its facial recognition system can help reunite lost or abducted children with their families and curb the traffic of human beings
– "Slippery slope" –
The screen of a computer with automatic facial recognition system shows the German Minister of the Interior Thomas de Maiziere in December 2017 visiting Suedkreuz station, where automatic facial recognition technologies are tested
.
This is an argument put forward by Brian Brackeen, founder and chief executive of Kairos facial recognition software developer. "I have a personal connection to technology, both culturally and socially," said Brackeen in a blog post on TechCrunch
"Government surveillance by facial recognition is an extraordinary invasion of life all citizens – and a slippery slope to losing control of our identities altogether. "
The Georgetown Study Found The Face The recognition algorithms were 5 to 10% less accurate among African-Americans only among Caucasians.
– Policy Issues –
Microsoft announced last month that it had made significant improvements for facial recognition "through skin tones". stated that he was in the process of launching a large-scale study "to improve the understanding of biases in facial badysis."
Although more accurate facial recognition is generally welcomed, civil liberties groups say that specific political safeguards should be in place. several consumer groups have abandoned a government-private initiative to develop standards for the use of facial recognition, stating that it was unlikely that the process would develop sufficient privacy protections
. is not currently incarcerated or wanted for violent crime. "
Jennifer Lynch, a lawyer at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said that the implica"
"An inaccurate system will involve people for crimes that they have not not committed.And Lynch said in a report earlier this year.
Lynch said that there are unique risks of violation or misuse of these data because "we"
According to Evan Selinger, professor of philosophy at the Rochester Institute of Technology, facial recognition is too dangerous for law enforcement.
"It's an ideal tool for oppressive surveillance Selinger said,
"This is such a serious threat to law enforcement that the problem can not be limited by imposing procedural safeguards."
Sorry, we do not accept no comments on this article.
var _fbq = window._fbq || (window._fbq = []);
if (! _fbq.loaded) {
var fbds = document.createElement (& # 39; script & # 39;);
fbds.async = true;
fbds.src = "http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbds.js";
var s = document.getElementsByTagName ('script') [0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore (fbds, s);
_fbq.loaded = true;
}
_fbq.push ([‘addPixelId’, ‘1401367413466420’]);
}) ();
window._fbq = window._fbq || [];
window._fbq.push ([“track”, “PixelInitialized”, {}]);
[ad_2]
Source link
