[ad_1]
"A name as I had taught
Is the name of a person, a place or a thing.
I am a person in this place and the world is overworked
With Shiv Lings
And the chicken wings
And every bird that sings.
Hamlet thought it was a play
Omar called them a sorry plan
St. Peter said that they were all for all
And a wise man said that they are not what they seem to be. "
From Do not be stupid
Yaar by Bachchoo
Photographs of the Russian Communist Party of the 1920s caused Leon Trotsky to be released. Stalin, who initiated this photoshopping, failed to remove Trotsky from the story. We know that Leon Yugashvilli (Stalin's real name) wanted to hang the photographs of the politburo in his room and preferred not to see Trotsky's bearded cup
. The recent decoration of the building involved the inscription of Rudyard Kipling's poem, If, on one of the large internal round pillars. The poem, as you well know, is an advice on how to live an ethical and balanced existence: […] If you can fill the ruthless minute / With sixty seconds of distance / yours is the Earth and all that is in it / And what's more, you'll be a man my son! "It's a remarkable job, especially since it was written like a long sentence!"
The student union officials erased the poem by painting it and They replaced it with a poem by the African-American poet Maya Angelou, reading this as news, with the photograph of a young girl named Sara Khan, who is "the officer of liberation and liberation." "access" of the union, standing near the pillar of poetry, I concluded that she had been offended by the boards The son of Kipling rather than his daughter.
Another student called Riddi Viswanathan, the union's "Diversity Officer," said the union's elected panel felt Kipling was "not in keeping with our values" because he was writing another poem entitled The White Man & # Burden's
Ms. Khan went on to say that Kipling was a racist and the poem of Angelou was ch "because he was recovering the story of people who had been oppressed by people like Kipling for so many centuries".
Si – itself contains no hint or racist language. I have never considered it offensive, although The White Man's Burden and other sentiments expressed in Kipling's work may be considered unacceptable and were even at the moment he wrote them.
Curiously, in a week when British politics was completely upset by rebellions in Parliament and by the fate of Brexit, and therefore the future of the nation at stake, this erasure of a poem has made headlines in the national media. Some considered it an act of illiberal censorship. By others, as an insult to a great writer, some of whose attitudes reflected the ideology of his time.
Students are absolutely in their rights to airbrush poems that they do not want to see on the walls of their building. . Those who oppose their objection will never see these walls and will have no concern or right to say what should or should not be on them. It's the same thing as Stalin's right to cut old Trotsky's pictures-he was just hanging them in his room. We think it's unfair that Stalin attempted to distort the story as the photographs were not just meant for his private viewing. This group of students does not prohibit Kipling's works from being read by posterity. It's just their wall and it will be the next group that will stick to Kipling's 20 poems if his "anti-crime agent" puts forward a convincing argument.
Several years ago, I wrote a dissertation on the influence of Indian myth and folklore on Kipling's work with a special emphasis on the jungle book. Years after writing, Charles Allen, prominent historian and biographer Rudyard, invited me to appear on a platform to discuss his work. The symposium was at the Royal Festival Hall. Charles was presiding, and as I began to present my ideas, three young men, a black young man, and two young black women, identifiable with their Caribbean accent, stood up and objected to me speaking. They told me that as Indians, I should not give a "racist writer" the benefit of any badysis.
I asked if they gave me the opportunity to present a more complex view of Kipling's attitudes towards the races, religions and imperial servants of the Indian subcontinent. They said that they were not interested in listening to anything about a racist. Charles, from the chair, then asked them what they had read about Kipling 's work and their answer was that they had read nothing of his work because they did not read it. have not read racist writers. This provoked a lukewarm reaction from the rest of the audience and the three of them came out of it.
The fact that the student diversity officer and the liberation and access officer of the University of Manchester move to erase If from their view the works of Kipling do not go away no history of literature. I hope that both officers will take the time to read the very important and very important works of Rudyard Kipling and will come to the conclusion that even if there are certainly racist and imperialist statements in the work, there are also has many contrary attitudes. His interpretation of the Indian idiom in English is, to this day, unparalleled. And especially that Rudy-baba has contributed a body of work to English literature comparable in importance to Dickens or maybe even … no, I will not say it!
B09
Source link
