[ad_1]
Since the beginning of the investigation into Russia, President Donald Trump has repeatedly argued that new reports or documents proved that he had done nothing wrong. But in each case, the newly published information does not say exactly what Trump claims to do.
In some cases, Trump looks worse.
Over the weekend, Trump repeatedly claimed on Twitter that a warrant the Foreign Intelligence Watch Court for former Carter Page campaign advisor shows that the advisor's investigation Special Robert Mueller is "discredited" and based on a "hoax" of
. have followed the case say that the parts of the warrant released in full do not seem to support Trump's arguments.
Trump has long argued that the FBI was not clear about the role that a record compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele played for obtaining the mandate's approval of the FISA, arguing that the record is an "opposition search". was retained by the Democrats campaign and Hillary Clinton.
But Asha Rangappa, a former FBI agent who now teaches at Yale Law School, notes that FISA's 412-page warrant application clearly includes a number of sources other than the Steele file and that it is not the case. Special investigation is much more important. "The Carter Page investigation is only one of many investigations in the Mueller probe," said Rangappa at TIME. "When I look at this FISA application, what I see is that it is only a part of a lot of other words that have been redacted.We do not know what these other words say [Based] from my experience, it would expose a lot of what they discovered in other parts of the survey using other techniques. "
Read more: The 200 Trump Arguments Made About the Russia Inquiry
David Kriss, a lawyer who previously worked in the Department of Justice, noted that the warrant also compromises a key argument about a memo written for Republican Republican Devin Nunes and released in February, which was that the FBI puts the key information on Steele's potential bias in a footnote that could easily be overlooked. In writing for the Lawfare site, Kriss noted that the footnote in question is one page long.
"There is literally no way for the FISA Court to have missed it," he writes.
Trump's statements on FISA's mandate follow a pattern he established after other releases, including notes from former FBI director James Comey on his interactions with the FISA. President, his June 2017 testimony to Congress on these memos. Nunes, a report of the Inspector General on the FBI and a report from the House Intelligence Committee.
In each case, Trump argued that it was justified or falsely claimed that the documents prove that there was no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.
The Comey memos are the first example and also one of the most contradictory.
After Trump fired the former FBI director, Comey gave a friend a copy of a February 14, 2017 memo in which he described Trump asking him to "let go" of the Investigation of the former national security adviser, Michael Flynn, with instructions to disclose some of his information to the newspaper The New York Times . Comey later told Congress that he hoped the leak would prompt the Department of Justice to appoint a special advisor, which he did.
Trump argued that the memo of February 14 and others that Comey wrote were "false", serving and false, " claiming he never asked him to drop the investigation or demanded personal loyalty .But when the Justice Department sent the notes to Congress, Trump claimed that they justified it. [19659006] "James Comey Memos has just come out and makes it clear that there was NO COLLUSION and no OBSTRUCTION," writes Trump in a tweet of April 19, 2018.
The Fact-Finding Site PolitiFact noted that "the pants on fire", stated that "nowhere in Comey's notes does it say that Trump did not glue or hindered justice."
Trump presented a similar argument, Congress, arguing that his testimony was inaccurate while claiming that he was exonerating
n testimony in which Comey says, with flashes of occasional anger, that Trump's characterization of his conduct at the FBI and the internal affairs of the office were "simple and simple lies," and claimed to have written a memo because he was concerned Trump "As he said yesterday, the President feels completely justified and is eager to continue to go ahead with his agenda with this public cloud removed," said his lawyer. from then Marc Kasowitz after the testimony. Trump echoed this line a day later. "Despite so many false statements and lies, a complete and complete justification," Trump tweeted .
Trump used a similar wording after the publication of Nunes' memo, which was severely criticized by Democrats on the House's intelligence committee about its description of the mandate of the FISA page
. Trump wrote on Twitter . "But the Russian witch hunt continues over and over again.They were not colluding and there was no obstruction (the word now used because after a year of endless watching and nothing find, collusion is dead). "
When House Democrats wrote a minority report on the memo Nunes, Trump The report claimed that the FBI had revealed Steele's potential bias and the fact that he was conducting research opposition and that the agency followed proper procedures in the management of the mandate.
Response on abuse of government supervision is a total political and legal BUST, "he wrote on Twitter ." Just confirms all the terrible things that were done. "
When the House Intelligence Committee released its final report on the Russian probe, Trump again claimed, but he soon began to overestimate the case.The report said the committee found no evidence that Trump's campaign had worked with Russia, but Trump soon began saying that he had actually found that the Trump campaign had not worked with Russia, a very different claim
The Committee intelligence concluded, there was no collusion between Russia and the Trump Campaign, "he wrote in a tweet .
Speaking to the press in July, Trump went further, saying that the House had "strongly" found that there was no collusion.
"There was no collusion," he said. "And people have seen that, and they have seen it very loudly.The House is already very convinced about it.Many people have expressed themselves strongly about it."
– with a report by Alana Abramson
[ad_2]
Source link
