[ad_1]
One of the world's greatest aviation mysteries has become increasingly mysterious.
For four years, Malaysia Airlines Flt. MH370 disappeared, conspiracy theories explaining why he deviated from his trajectory and where he ended up breaking loose in the imagination of amateur detectives, experts and authorities.
Was he hijacked by a suicidal pilot? Has it been hacked remotely? Did lithium-ion batteries and tropical fruit in its hold create a deadly badtail that exploded?
On Monday, investigators released their final report on the disappearance of the plane, concluding that none of these scenarios was likely. ] But they at least definitely decided that someone had manually rerouted the plane after cutting communications and said that this evidence was "irresistibly" saying another theory: that a "third party" had hijacked the flight – and this was not the pilot
"We looked at the pilot, the flight attendant.We are very satisfied with their background, their training, their mental health, their mental state.We are not of the opinion that this could have been an event committed by the pilot, "Chief Investigator Kok Soo Chon told reporters in Kuala Lumpur, according to the Australian newspaper The Age .
"But at the same time, we can not deny the fact that there was a return from the plane," which put the plane off the road, he said . "We can not deny the fact that, as we have badyzed, the systems have been manually disabled with the intention or otherwise." So, we think that there is also a possibility that could explain all of this, "said the manager." Whatever we do, we can not rule out the possibility of a third party or someone else. a third party or unlawful interference. "
Of course, what happened to MH370 will never be known until the plane itself is found.That is safe, c & rsquo; The Boeing 777 was carrying 239 people on board – including three Americans – when he disappeared en route to Beijing from Kuala Lumpur in early March 8, 2014.
Someone in the badpit contacted Malaysian air traffic control just before 1:20 am, saying "Very good, good night", but failed to check with Ho Chi Minh City controllers.
None Distress call was not received, but aircraft communications and radar systems have disconnected
The radar shows that the aircraft deviated from its course and flew over the Malay Peninsula before heading towards the Indian Ocean and disappearing entirely
No serious alarms were raised before 6:30 am, and the report released on Monday indicates that the Malaysian and Vietnamese controllers had a big blow – they should have sent a red flag several hours earlier. The Kuala Lumpur radio controller should also have monitored his movements, according to the report.
In addition, the investigators concluded that the four emergency locator transmitters of the aircraft should have issued signals indicating the location of the aircraft.
With such information, two search operations costing hundreds of millions of dollars failed to find any sign of the aircraft.
The most recent failed search was completed in May. 19659002] "It is almost inconceivable and certainly socially unacceptable in the era of modern aviation with 10 million pbadengers boarding commercial aircraft every day, for a large commercial plane missing and for the world not to know for sure what has become on board, "said the Australian Transport Safety Bureau in a report published in 2017.
" Despite the extraordinary efforts of hundreds of people involved Since 1965, more than 25 possible debris are stranded, three of which – including sections of the two wings, found around the African coast – were confirmed as parts of It at least put to rest the conspiracy theories that the plane had been transported to a secret destination and its pbadengers could still be alive.
The Australian Government investigation concluded that the left wing of the aircraft was not closed. configured for landing – suggesting that the jet ran out of fuel and that the nose dipped quickly rather than being deliberately driven in the ocean.
The families of the pbadengers and crew that were on board remain livid for lack of conclusions, including in Monday's report – and require the search for the plane to resume so that they can get the closure.
"They must continue to search – that's a fact," said Australian Danica Weeks, whose husband P aul was on board, at the Sunshine Coast Daily
"C & # 39; "It's got to be somewhere," she says. "They can not just push it under the rug and say, that's all." [19659007] One of the most popular theories since the disappearance of the plane was that the captain, Zaharie Ahmad Shah, hijacked the vessel and deliberately
The report from Australia indicated that he had a flight simulator at home and that he used it to test a route somewhat similar to the eventual off-road journey of the plane six weeks earlier
He even went on the "60 Minutes" of Australia to say that they thought the 53-year-old flyboy was responsible.
"By the time the pilot turned off the transpond he depressurized the plane, [it] disables the pbadengers. ", Larry Vance, a veteran investigator of Canadian aviation, told the program:
" He was committing suicide. Unfortunately, he was killing everyone on board. And he did it deliberately, "said Vance.
The experts noted that the plane took an unusual turn to the left at one point.
" Capt. Zaharie dipped her wing to see Penang, her hometown, "said Simon Hardy, pilot and senior instructor of Boeing 777." It could be a long emotional farewell, or a brief and emotional farewell to his hometown. "
But an Australian aviation official insisted that Zaharie would have been unconscious when the plane crashed like everyone else. concluded that the pilot was unconscious and that there was "no evidence of mental or psychiatric problems" and "no sign of social isolation" with Zaharie, nor any financial problem.
The audio from Zaharie's dispatches from the badpit seemed normal "I'm not excluding anything, but there were two psychiatrists in my team, and they were charged with Examine the pilot's audio recordings, and they concluded that there was no anxiety and no stress in the recording, it was just normal, and they have also recorded the images of CCTV. […] They found no significant behavioral changes, "he said, according to The Guardian.
Kok noted that an air pirate would not have needed the expertise of aviation to take over. a plane, you can still engage in illegal interference, "he said, according to The Australian." You can still get in with a knife. "
Yet, the official offered little evidence to know who could be a "third party."
No terrorist group took credit for the disappearance of the aircraft and no ransom demand The origins of all pbadengers – even two Iranian nationals who rode with fake pbadports – have been verified by their respective countries, and nothing suspicious has appeared, said Kok.Instructions has also shot down several other popular theories.
"We have had more than 60 allegations. … We kidnapped them one by one and saw what was left behind, "Kok said.
The former Prime Minister of Malaysia, Tun Dr. Mahathir, suggested this year that" I have not been able to do anything. It could have been hacked and remotely controlled, the technology is there, you know how good people are able to fly unmanned planes, and even combat aircraft have to be pilotless, "he said.
But Kok said that there was a sign of that.
Some had also speculated that the 487-pound lithium-ion batteries and 5 tons of mangosteens
But Monday's report found it "highly improbable", based on the fact that both items are often shipped together without problem.
"There were 36 occasions when both batteries and mangosteens were shipped together to China between January and May, and we found no irregularities in the evaluation of the battery. packaging, "said Mr. Kok
" the two items of interest, lithium batteries and mangosteens, were transported for a long time before and after the event and packed and loaded according to the procedures of & quot; # 39; standard use. "
Source link
