Alita Battle Angel Technology makes it a must-see – / Movie


alita battle angel clips

Alita: Battle Angel is the latest action movie of two of our blockbuster directors most similar to the authors: Robert Rodriguez and James Cameron. Cameron served as a producer, but spent more than 10 years trying to get the movie started. It was originally announced in 2003 but the production of Avatar prevented Cameron from engaging in the project, in addition to other development issues. In 2016, Robert Rodriguez was named director and the film was finally shot.

According to a 90's manga series by Yukito Kishiro titled Gunnm in Japan and Battle Angel Alita here in the United States the theater Alita: Battle Angel is a marvel of technology, offering rich visuals and kinetic action that is more enjoyable to watch.

I think that the merit of this film is not necessarily linked to the story and the script, which is useful, if not too heavy. And that only swells to launch a sequel, I wonder if we will get there one day. No, the merit of this film is the show.

Show attracted people to the cinema from the first days of cinema. same Sneeze of Fred Ott It was the pinnacle of the show when people saw it for the first time, but the silent film evolved and it became known for the work of George Melies and Fritz Lang and Cecil B. Demille. The public has always been attracted by technological advances. The jazz singer was a hit (racist) for the novelty of audio. The Wizard of Oz and Carried away by the wind still hold box office records, as they first broke the black and white film mold. This continued at a steady pace. Animated films. 3D. Technicolor. Vista-vision. When presentation technology has been set, special effects are the next frontier and movies like Star wars (1977) showed the audience something they had never seen before. This is the gold ticket that filmmakers have pursued since the show's kingdom. What could filmmakers do to push the limits?

Over the years, this response has turned into computer graphics and seems to have culminated in the role of Steven Spielberg. Jurassic Park. But it was still only a small step. The public did not know it yet. Star Wars: Episode I – The Ghost Threat powered things into the future with fully realized photo-realistic characters generated in the computer, interacting seamlessly with real-life action elements, compliments of Industrial Light & Magic. WETA Workshop has advanced this work with motion capture performance in The Lord of the Rings The trilogy and filmmakers soon realized that the limits of filmmaking were no longer limited by technology, but by their imagination.

3D ticketing


Although technology has grown in the last 20 years since these defining moments, it has been less spectacular and more like smaller iteration steps. From time to time, something will take your breath away. James Cameron's Avatar did that in the world of 3D cinema. In my opinion, it was the show of Avatar and the new technology that propelled it to success rather than history in the movie itself. For the first time, the 3D effects promised with the new technology were real and vibrant. Cameron's technological know-how has borne fruit, creating one of the most successful films in media history. I would say that since the film has left no cultural imprint since its release, it is the spectacle of technology that has brought the public to the theater and in no way history.

That's why you'd be hard-pressed to find someone who knows the names of the characters in Avatar or one of the stories of mythology. For a year or two, there were sometimes Na'vi convention cosplayers, but even that has practically disappeared. Even Pandora's recent expansion to Disney World's Animal Kingdom Park seems more motivated by the sight of driving than by fans of Avatar flock to the park en masse as they should with the next Star wars additions.

James Cameron has made so few films over the past three decades, it seems, because he seems almost more interested in technology than in the movies themselves. Alita: Battle Angel seems no exception. And since he's busy making sequels to Avatar, he needed someone else with the chops to push the envelope for him. This is where Robert Rodriguez entered the picture.

Spy Kids and Sin City

Robert Rodriguez debuted El Mariachi for pennies on the dollar, a brilliant action movie in Spanish that was created from Sundance Film Festival. Over the years, he gained independence from Hollywood and moved to Austin, Texas. That's where he shot movies like Spy Kids and Sin City and these, I think, are what gave him the chops to remove Alita: Battle Angel.

In fact, there is a direct line between the effects of Star wars and Spy Kids. Spy Kids, which was released in 2001, was the last picture of Rodriguez on the real movie. He did his post-production work at Skywalker Ranch and that's where George Lucas was working on The attack of clones, the first major feature shot entirely with digital cameras. Rodriguez builds on his repertoire taking pictures Spy Kids 2 numerically. In 2002, it was only the second (out of two) films to be shot and published in digital form. The first was Lucas The attack of clones.

Rodriguez used the digital workflow to push the media even further, creating a precise world, black and white, and yellow for Frank Miller's adaptation. Sin Cityreleased in 2005, shot almost entirely in front of a green screen, Rodriguez has captured the imagination of fans of comics and blacks forcing the technology a little further. I believe Sin City was a success because of the nature of the show. That brought in more than 150 million dollars worldwide. I also believe that the show was gone by the time of the continuation of 2014, Sin City: a lady to kill for, has been freed. He made less than a third. The public had seen it before and Miller's stories are becoming more and more obsolete and problematic as the days go by.

Cameron chose Rodriguez to bring that pioneering spirit to Alita: Battle Angel, but also because of the diversity of Rodriguez's abilities as an action filmmaker. According to Cameron, "[Robert Rodriguez] loves to make children's movies, but he also likes to make a difference. Very rough action films, with difficult contours and adults. So AlitaIt's a bit in the middle. There are difficult moments, there is a difficult action, but there is also this kind of wonderful and wonderful center. "

Alita Battle Angel: first screenings


As a movie, Alita: Battle Angel is beautiful to watch. The sweeping of the city evokes images of everything Blade runner and Mad Max at Star wars and Rollerballbut, at the base, is a faithful – maybe as well faithful – adaptation of classical Japanese history. It offers a number of thrilling sequences that illustrate both the technological advances of the media and the performance of Rodriguez as the undisputed master of the sequence of actions.

The script, written by James Cameron and Laeta Kalogridis, marks the failure of the film. Instead of telling a clear and compact story that introduces you to the world and the central conflict, it's too difficult to include all the material needed for a sequel. This really ignites a film that would otherwise have been simplified to contain only its most essential elements and conflicts. It also removes much of Alita's mystery herself, giving us answers about who she is and where she came from too quickly, if we even needed it. All this serves to defocus the story in favor of the franchise story, but will it even be a franchise? I wonder. I hope it was a fun ride. But I do not see it as probable. But I've never seen Avatar like a franchise, so maybe there is hope.

There are, however, many solid films to present. For audiences unfamiliar with history, Rodriguez is able to obtain excerpts of the Hitchcockian orientation reminiscent of Rear window and Suspicion. In fact, the threat of Dr. Ido (played with warmth and charm by Christoph Waltz) as a killer is cleverly assembled, forcing the public to participate in the suspense of the film.

Rodriguez handles quiet moments with aplomb, action sequences like a genius and cheese history with a warm embrace. You absolutely have to suspend your disbelief for the movie to work, but it's easy when it's so fun to watch. Romance in Alita: Battle Angel is just as authentic if not cheesy; Rodriguez directs with his heart on his sleeve and that fits perfectly in the atmosphere of the film B which permeates the film.

The reason people should talk about it, however, the show that would take them to the theater should be Alita herself. Performed by Rosa Salazar, Alita is the heart of the film, both from the point of view of history and technology. Alita is a photo-realistic motion capture creation that interacts and emotes perfectly like an almost human cyborg. It is this type of technology that gave life to Grand Moff Tarkin Thief One, who made this movie, in my opinion, the most George Lucas-y of the recent batch of Star wars movies – take bold steps in the world of worry-free effects. Tarkin has encountered problems because he was an iconic character played in life by an iconic actor. Everyone knew what he was supposed to look like. This is not a problem with Alita, although some have expressed an inability to overcome the exaggerated eyes of the character. They say that the eyes are the windows of the soul, and the WETA team that gave life to Alita, in collaboration with Salazar, has created an authentic one and they should be proud of the work they have done.

But will that suffice to bring the audience to the theater? Weekend returns at the box office suggest no. Is it enough to advance technology that the public will want to see in itself? If they go to the theater, will they believe Alita and enjoy the action sequences and thrills of the film? Or will they stay home because it looks like the kind of thing they've seen before?

I hope the audience will give a shot to this movie. For all the flaws of the script, there is a lot to like in the movie. This is perhaps the most original film in the list of comics to be shot in 2019, it would be a pity that people do not try.

Cool Web posts:

Source link