This article may contain personal opinions and opinions of the author.
All major US carriers, with the notable exception of AT & T, have a rather pathetic list of phones against world standards. Mediums are particularly affected, because on Verizon, T-Mobile or Sprint, it is generally the flagship products of Samsung, Apple or LG from last year that play a role midranger the following year, when the new model is introduced and their price is reduced.
As you can see, Verizon's postpaid choice is pretty pathetic compared to other operators, both at home and abroad, but our legacy CDMA network can be blamed, and it will be removed at the end of 2019. T-Mobile does not excuse, but positions itself as the carrier of discounts and promotions and therefore seeks to achieve value for money, as shown by its choice to be the first US network to officially sell the OnePlus wallet.
AT & T, on the other hand, is doing quite well in postpaid choices, even though, like all American carriers, it suffers from the case of Huawei-titis and the general malaise of Chinese brands for reasons beyond their control. This is perhaps the main reason why there is such a paltry choice of phone brands in the United States. Apple, Samsung, LG and Motorola are carving out the lion's share of the US market while, overall, this arrangement is very different, as shown by the IDC statistics below.
Can you tell from where does the gap between the United States and the global trend come from? Why, Chinese brands, of course. National security companies are convinced that retail phone manufacturers pose an immediate threat to security, on par with 5G "made in China" base stations, and seek to convince anyone who would like to listen.
As a result, the US is deprived of excellent high-end products like the P30 Pro and its 10x zoom system, more and more unique phones from brands such as Xiaomi, Oppo or Vivo, but also A true competitor of the mid-range market. In the United States, phones under $ 500 are rare, if we ignore the promotions of Samsung or Apple last year in promotions that can very well be fulfilled by phones like the P30, F1 or any equivalent of OnePlus from Oppo or Vivo.
Heck, the new Axon 10 Pro that is trying to penetrate the US market through the back door with fanfare costs $ 600 and offers all the features of a flagship phone from the top 5 brands, including a Snapdragon 855 chipset and a zoom 3x telephoto.
Enter Google. In one fell swoop, despite the way in which it was trivializing or cannibalizing its Pixel brand, mainly from Apple-centric publications, Google occupied what is perhaps the largest under-exploited niche in the US telephony market. United States – that of competent midrangers or cheap flag-bearers who usually swarm with Chinese. brand models. Since these are banned in the United States because "Murica!", There is simply no better choice than the Pixel 3a or 3a XL if you are looking for a new handset of less value than $ 500 with a minimum of compromise on major US carriers. sales are.
Pixel 3a is the elephant in the US market China store
The Pixel 3a at $ 399 and the XL 3a at $ 479 draw a lot of birds with a stone. In an increasingly image-centric world, they offer cameras that are equal or often better than those at $ 1,000 phones. The oily stock of Android with 3-year upgrade warranties, a free backup of racks, large batteries, durable polycarbonate bodies that you do not have to baby, or easy repairability and Economics only add to the already formidable appeal of Google's digital photography.
In fact, unless unforeseen incidents in production or launch, the Pixel 3a may be the only affordable phone to reach if you're looking for a more compact device, and the 3a XL, your obvious choice for a smartphoning. normal size in a reasonable budget. What makes mid-range pixels a tangible answer to the Chinese telephony puzzle in the US is also their greater availability – on Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint and AT & T-compatible – by compared to their predecessors.
"Google is not a hardware company," the Pixel 3a could usher in a new age for the US telephony market, just as the trade war with China threatens to wipe out our options. thought?
