[ad_1]
Governor Cuomo calls his assault by the Supreme Court “moot” and “moot”. Taurus.
Since the ruling only blocked the application of its strict restrictions on places of worship in the orange and red zones, and the parties who sued are no longer in those zones, the government argues that it doesn’t matter. In fact, it sets a serious precedent against its insistence on treating religious institutions harsher than secular people.
The court ruled 5-4 in favor of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn and a group of Orthodox Jewish synagogues who argued Cuomo’s rules unfairly targeted them, violating the constitutional guarantee of religious freedom.
The government had banned the presence of more than 10 people at religious services in a red zone and 25 in an orange zone – regardless of the size of the church, mosque or temple. Now he insists the ruling is “more illustrative of the Supreme Court than anything else” because Justice Amy Coney Barrett replaced the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
But Cuomo’s limits far exceeded those the court had authorized in May and July. California limited participation to 25 percent of capacity building capacity or 100 participants, whichever is lower. And Nevada has a limit of 50 people.
Judge Neil Gorsuch burned Cuomo’s double standards: “It is time – time passed – to make it clear that while the pandemic poses many serious challenges, there is no world in which the Constitution tolerates them. color-coded executive decrees that reopen liquor and bicycle stores. but close churches, synagogues and mosques, ”he wrote.
And the government’s burden has struck deep. Remote services are no real substitute for in-person services: you cannot receive Communion through Zoom.
Representative-elect Nicole Malliotakis (R-SI / Brooklyn) noted the perfect time to deliver the court decision: “It is fitting that the court decision was made on the eve of Thanksgiving, a holiday founded by pilgrims who settled in North America in search of Religious Freedom. “Bingo.
[ad_2]
Source link