[ad_1]
The Department of Defense clarifies its position on a controversial amendment to the National Defense Clearance Act (NDAA) that would prevent a species from being listed as endangered in the next ten years. The DOD has rebuffed previous recommendations that revealed Wednesday that the agency was against the amendment proposed by Rep. Rob Bishop 
Robert (Rob) William BishopMore than 100 Dems Oppose GOP Efforts to Change Species at Risk Act Legislators Introduce Legislation to Amend the Species at Risk Act Danger New emails reveal that Pruitt exempts Utah oil companies from Smog Rules MORE (R-Utah), chairman of the Natural Resources Committee. The Ministry of the Interior supports the provision in question and believes that this could help the Ministry to avoid any negative impact on military installations if the case were to be made by Pete Giambastiani, Assistant Under-Secretary-General for Defense Legislative Affairs, said in a statement
that the response to the recommendations leaked Wednesday between the Department of Defense and the House committees is overturned. 19659002] In these recommendations, the agency wrote that she opposed the addition and "urges its exclusion".
"The Department opposes the disposition of the House and asks for its exclusion because it is not necessary to protect the military tests and therefore is not appropriate for the purpose". inclusion in the NDAA, "reads the statement.
" The inclusion of the provision incorrectly suggests that the DOD has had or may have difficulty managing these species without degrading the military tests and training, which is simply not the case. "
has long been a point of contention between landowners and environmental advocates who have insisted that it be listed on the Endangered Species Act
[ad_2]
Source link
