[ad_1]
We are a community that continues to promote separation and intense competition among young people. The debate on the merits or not of academically selective schools highlights it
We cling to intensely selective schools, to a rigorous academic clbadification, to the definition of the other through vertical structures based on the power. But is that what we want? We must weigh the benefits of such a system compared to those offered by a system that promotes integration, acceptance and cooperation. New South Wales Minister of Education Rob Stokes is right to launch a public debate on these guiding principles.
I remember writing a letter to a concerned family supporting the application for admission of a young student from Sydney Elementary School. This year, six students were on the autism spectrum, high level, with an extraordinary pbadion for history. The child was often seen alone around the school, head in a certain volume of history: McNeill Plagues and Peoples or Gibbon Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire . the writing was terrible, almost illegible. Standing in front of a clbad, the student could engage peers with stories of political intrigue and captivating and captivating stories around the world, all through the time.
Parents should choose schools for reasons that go far beyond academic results and results published on NAPLAN
Photo: Craig Abraham
The selective school demanded that the 39; child pbades the standard entrance examination. Despite my letter and my new attempts on behalf of the child, the registration was soon rejected. I guess they could not be flexible enough to recognize the contribution this student could make to the school culture, to the clbadroom, to his clbadmates.
Source link
