[ad_1]
Updated
July 2, 2018 14:43:19
The Government of South Australia will pay Henry Keogh $ 2.5 million for his conviction for spilled murder
. Main points:
- Henry Keogh will be paid $ 2.5 million after 20 years in prison
- His murder conviction his fiancée was overthrown in 2014
- The Attorney General says it's not going to happen 39 not his innocence, but the risk of litigation
Attorney General Vickie Chapman today said that ex gratia payment was "the most appropriate course of action". Mr. Keogh spent 20 years in prison after being convicted of the murder of his fiancé in 1994, Anna-Jane Cheney.
He was convicted in 1995 of drowning Ms. Cheney in a bath at the couple's Magill home in the northeastern suburb of Adelaide.
This conviction was quashed by the Criminal Appeal Court in 2014, after finding that there had been a miscarriage of justice because of flawed medico-legal evidence.
million. Keogh was released from prison, but in 2015, the director of Prosecuti
Ms. Chapman stated that the government had consulted two independent attorneys on this subject
"This is an issue that culminates in an application being made to the former government a little over a year ago, "she said.
" There was a miscarriage of justice and a man spent nearly 20 years in prison.
"This settlement was made in recognition of the risk to the people of South Australia …
Mrs. Chapman said that there was" no winner In the case.
"There will be in the community who think that this regulation is an amount that is hardly enough for a person who has spent 20 years in prison for a conviction that has been canceled, "she said.
" On the other hand, there will be other people in the community who will take it that Mr. Keogh should not be reconciled. " to have a cent
"the regulation is not an attempt of [change their minds].
"The opinion of Mr. Keogh's innocence or guilt or otherwise, is academic in my badessment of this case."
Keogh has always denied murdering his fiancée
In 1995, a jury convicted Mr. Keogh was sentenced to life imprisonment for a period of 25 years without parole, retroactive to July 7, 1994
Mr. Keogh claimed that he had left the house on the night of his fiancée's death while she was going to take a bath and when he returned home later that evening, he found her lying on her side, face under the water.
He says that he removed her from the bath and tried to revive her
Dr. Colin Manock, who conducted the autopsy, testified at the trial that he believed that Ms. Cheney's drowning had been helped.
The pathologist stated that he considered that the bruises on Ms. Cheney's left leg were evidence
He also found that bruising to the head and back of the neck had been caused by the fact that his head had hit the hard surface of the bath.
However, this was revealed during Mr. Keogh's period. In 2014, Dr. Manock later changed his mind on crucial evidence
In his judgment, the Court of Criminal Appeal acknowledged that Dr. Manock's confession after the trial constituted a motive decisive appeal
. The opinion, for reasons that will be discussed later, is described as new compelling evidence that should be considered on appeal in the interests of justice, "the judgment said.
The court found that Dr. Manock's testimony was flawed.
"A number of the very important observations and opinions of Dr. Manock misled the prosecution, the defense, the trial judge and the jury. there was a substantial miscarriage of justice, "said the judgment.
The court refused to acquit Mr. Keogh, concluding that "it would be permissible for a properly directed jury to convict".
courts and trials,
state-parliament
murder-and-manslaughter,
law-crime-and-justice
adelaide-5000,
her
Published
July 2, 2018 14:06:19
Source link
