[ad_1]
Australians complain about the mistaken belief that the government's My Health Record (MHR) is open to piracy and endangering the personal health records of every Australian.
Data breaches are far too common and Australians are right to be cautious about who holds their personal information and the level of security provided. However, to what extent do we interpret vigilance for paranoia?
Privacy and the protection of personal information will always be an important issue and Australians should never give up the right to claim the greatest responsibility
. MHR's ability to provide and maintain a level of security guaranteeing privacy is flawed and lacks logic.
Australia has a health system that is the envy of the world. We are leading the way in medical research, medical technology and specialized treatment programs.
A system funded by the federal government is part of the mosaic that makes what we have so special. MHR adds to this mosaic.
The idea of a central system allowing hospitals and doctors to have records of Australian health is a model that we must adopt. He is very late. The information in real time allows the doctor facing an emergency situation to treat someone with more efficiency and speed, and to make accurate diagnoses based on medical history.
He saves lives and improves care. Nothing is better than that.
Critics believe that the disadvantages outweigh the benefits. It's hard to understand how saving lives and improving health care is negative.
The choice to decide is a right that we value. When presented with the right information, our decision making is improved. Yet Australians who choose to withdraw from MHR make a short-sighted decision based on misinformation.
It's a decision they might regret when they face an emergency.
Various media reports have painted a picture of inevitability. Australian health records will be at stake. No federal government would ever endanger the personal and private information of Australians.
He has invested hundreds of millions of dollars in the development of MHR, not for it's a security risk.
system will be without the highest form of security to ensure data protection.
I am very protective of privacy and data protection. My decision to opt is based on a thoughtful fact and the right information, as opposed to speculative noise generated by special interest groups that are trying to derail a late program.
Save lives, that's what the MHR will achieve. the population, it also improves health care and outcomes, and in the long run, reduces costs.
MHR allows:
Physicians make more informed decisions about prescription drugs.
Doctors to see what drugs are used and prescribe drugs that support them
Australians control who sees what information and when.
People see their medical records and use them for their own medical care.
People to follow who looks at their health records – identify and address any potential misuse.
Every Australian should be cautious about privacy but being afraid of usin g doctors for personal gain is a hard argument to accept. The introduction of MHR is not to be feared. The government is not hiding in the dark waiting to trap our personal information – they already have it.
Michael Connory is Chief of Security, In-Depth
Source link
