[ad_1]
A m 438. On the day of the trial, she enters the room posing on the first day: Beate Zschäpe walks to her seat with a smile on her face. In her black pantsuit and pink scarf, she looks more like a lawyer than a woman accused of murder ten times. She sits between her lawyers, while former defenders give disinterested acknowledgments. Wolfgang Heer watched hypnotized in his laptop, Wolfgang Stahl bored his smartphone.
No one wants to show nervousness, no one transforms emotions, everybody plays the role of participant in the professional process. Only the clatter of the many cameras and spectators filled up until the last siege reveals that today ends one of the longest criminal proceedings in the history of the Republic: this Wednesday, the verdict is pronounced in the NSR process. And one should not expect that the sometimes high and surprisingly light imprisonment sentences announced by the Senate of the State Security of the Higher Regional Court of Munich under the direction of Manfred Götzl , immediately provide for a discussion
. The Senate convicted of killing ten people and involved in several explosive attacks, is not a surprise. "Guilt weighs particularly hard," says Götzl. Dismissal after 15 years is so impossible. Beate Zschäpe can face decades of imprisonment.
This severe judgment has frozen. For several minutes, she firmly folds her hands on the table and looks at the judge's table. She drops her hair on her face like a curtain, so that no one can see her expression. Is the verdict really unexpected for you? Did she really think that her lawyers could get a shorter prison sentence? Götzl sees his actions "in intentional and deliberate cooperation" with the murderers of execution: Zschäpe was a member of the NSU terrorist organization and knew everything, tolerated and participated, according to the Senate. Thus, he takes without any loss the point of view of the federal prosecutor.
Wolfgang Stahl's arms fold his arms in disbelief and inform his opinion of the verdict without saying a word. He has always maintained that the evidence of the conviction of his client for murder is insufficient. Heer gently shakes his head, the third public defender Anja Sturm seems exhausted.
Things are better for the other defendants, and surprisingly well for André E. Götzl lifts the arrest warrant of the NSU convict in the verdict. Pre-trial detention was no longer proportionate. Earlier, the 38-year-old man was sentenced to two years and six months in prison for supporting a terrorist organization. The federal prosecutor's office had required at least twelve years and suggested in the plea that he could be considered the fourth man of the NSU federal government because of his frequent visits to the trio's shelter.
His wife Susann sits next to him, smiles and seems to be really happy. André E. had chosen a strategy different from that of Zschäpe: he was silent, and everywhere. In the meantime, it appeared that his lawyers were not properly represented because they were not asking any questions or requests. But in the end, their strategy paid off. Götzl suspends the arrest warrant after ten months in the detention center; The remaining 20 months should then probably reside in Saxony near their home.
The principal defendant maneuvered his statement in the dreaded "secret" case that their lawyers had always warned against. All that supports the evidence and the allegations in the indictment is believed by the Senate. "To the extent that it involves itself in the discussion, but their credibility does not come to their statements," Götzl puts it in the most beautiful German lawyer, which means something like: There's nothing almost nothing
neo-Nazi exposed escaped. The subliminal plaintiff Sebastian Scharmer complains that the accused could have been on the side of security had he invited a V-man of constitutional protection as a witness. Scharmer would have been better able to examine the connection between André E. and the NSU, but Götzl did not think it was necessary at the hearing – and rejected the motion.
So, the wrong people are now applauding: Five neo-Nazis from the far right southern comradeship of Bavaria have taken their seats, they cheer briefly. At a break in the negotiations, they greet Andre E., who described himself as a "National Socialist," from the balcony and reported "thumbs up." When the arrest warrant is lifted, they triumph and roar "Yes!". Only a number separates the partially condemned right-wing extremists from several members of the Turkish consular corps, including Ambbadador Ankara in Berlin. This is also the process of the NSU: representatives of the Turkish origin of people that Uwe Mundlos, Uwe Böhnhardt and Beate Zschäpe hated for that they murdered them with blows of fire in the face – are sitting near NSU-Gesinnungsgenossen, who accused the signal to the perpetrators and their supporters with a smile
The defendant Ralf Wohlleben receives only ten in nine cases instead of the twelve years required to have helped and encouraged murder. He had obtained a weapon for the NSU; his wife Jacqueline shakes his hand and the shelves upon hearing the verdict. Her husband has been in prison for almost seven years, so an end is predictable. Holger G. must serve three years. He provided the terrorist militia with documents and health insurance cards until the end. And Carsten S., who was the only credible remorse and contributed to the Enlightenment, also for three years behind bars. His contribution – the acquisition and delivery of the Ceska 83 with silencer, with which nine migrants were murdered – was probably punishable by a suspended sentence.
It is one of the rituals of every major criminal case that the parties evaluate the judgments differently, Zschäpe's lawyers announce when sentenced to go for review. Victims' lawyers complain about what they consider to be too lenient a punishment for André E., but also for Ralf Wohlleben. The Federal Court of Justice will certainly have to deal with several requests for appeal, but that can take time. The OLG Senate alone has about a year and a half to write its written verdict; This is only while defense lawyers, federal prosecutors and co-complainants can send their justifications to Karlsruhe.
Politicians, who may not have watched the trial for a day, warn them not to draw lines. The survivors complain that they still do not know why the trio chose their husband, father or brother. And again and again, it is claimed that there have been more delinquents. This may be. Even representatives of the federal prosecutor's office do not exclude it – in theory. But she has not been able to identify other writers. The NSU has partitioned loudly and trusts only a few people. Prosecutors could only write what needed to be proven and hope it would last. He has stopped, at least until now
But no verdict can appease the sadness and anger with which the survivors of the NSU must live. In front of the court, 300 demonstrators commemorate the murdered. Some people take pictures with the faces of victims in the air. After the verdict, there are clashes between some protesters and the police; the context is not clear at the beginning.
The grief of the bereaved can not be helped by a declaration of solidarity. When Götzl describes the murder of Halit Yozgat, whom Uwe Mundlos and Uwe Böhnhardt murdered in his Kbadel Internet Café on April 6, 2006, the father cries and screams several times in Turkish: "There is no such thing as". other god than Allah! " He is crying with the voice of a desperate man. Götzl interrupts his speech and reminds Ismail Yozgat to rest. He should otherwise throw it out, and "I do not want it at all".
Source link
