[ad_1]
Helsinki / Washington – This is probably also a call to the "genius loci": where 43 years ago, the greatest convergence of the Cold War was achieved, US President Donald Trump and the Russian President Vladimir Putin want a Monday. Restart in relations between Washington and Moscow. The Finnish capital Helsinki becomes the site of the first summit of the two controversial politicians
On 1 August 1975, the final act of the "Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe" (CSCE) was signed in the capital Finnish with a complete architecture measures of confidence. Followed by the disarmament negotiations in Vienna, the Helsinki Final Act laid the foundation for overcoming the cold war. One can not expect such a historic breakthrough at the Helsinki summit. Trump's security advisor, John Bolton, even asked if there would even be a joint final statement. After all, three working sessions are scheduled at the Finnish Presidential Palace, with a four-eyed discussion followed by a delegation meeting followed by a working lunch.
Riddles on Trump's Attitude Towards Crimea
According to US Ambbadador to Moscow Jon Huntsman wants Washington to blame Moscow for its policies in Syria and Ukraine and its influence on elections of 2016 in the United States. However, Trump's security advisor, Mr. Bolton, did not leave out and did not rule out a change in Washington's firm stance in the Ukrainian conflict in the US media. Although it is the current US policy to reject the annexation of Crimea, but he could not speak for the president, he said last week on US television. After his unconventional summit with North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un, Trump is also challenging the tenets of Moscow's foreign policy, even though he has just confirmed them in a joint statement of the Alliance's NATO summit
diplomats
The fact is that US-Russian relations can only go up. It hit record lows in March, when the United States identified 60 Russian diplomats in response to the poisoning attack of former dual spy Sergei Skripal. With this measure, "the little left Russian-US relations will be destroyed," said Russian Ambbadador to the United States, Anatoly Antonov, at that time. In April, the two Syrian states came dangerously close to an open confrontation after Trump had bombed Syrian positions in response to an alleged toxic gas attack by the regime.
After all, Cold War communications between Washington and Moscow continued, then established hotlines should prevent accidental nuclear war. Of course, security experts see an increasing risk for Europe's security, even in broken relationships between the two great powers. There is "an absolute lack of trust" between key players, said OSCE Secretary General Thomas Greminger in an APA interview last November. "There are situations that can be dangerous," he said, referring to troop deployments and maneuvers near the border.
Mangott politician salutes summit
"It is urgent that this meeting take place" Mangott at the top. Indeed, the whole architecture of disarmament between the United States and Russia threatens to collapse because the dialogue on strategic stability between the two states has collapsed. Disarmament treaties have been the main achievements of subsequent US-Soviet and Russian summits since the 1970s.
However, the signing of the last disarmament treaty dates back more than eight years. It was signed in April 2010 by US President Barack Obama and Dmitry Medvedev at a summit in Prague. Obama wanted to push the "reset" button in post-Iraq relations, but in reality he got worse.
For three decades, Moscow and Washington have been fighting for their spheres of influence around the world. After being increasingly cornered by the eastward expansion of NATO, the war in Iraq and the overthrow in the former Soviet space, Moscow went into attack mode from 2014. With the annexation of Crimea and the civil war in the east of Ukraine, he showed the West the sign of arrest, a year later he intervened in the Syrian war to strengthen his position in the region
19659002] While Putin appeared to be in good hands with US Republican President George W. Bush (2001-2009), he was not in charge of the war. found no connection with Trump's predecessor, Obama. In addition, the relationship was poisoned by mbad protests against the 2012 Russian presidential election, which took the Kremlin autocrats off the wrong foot. Obama's state secretary, Hillary Clinton, reportedly played a role in the game, according to Moscow. As a result, the champagne corks in the Kremlin should have cracked when Clinton was defeated by Trump's political newcomer in the US presidential election in November 2016.
It is highly anticipated whether this will spark between Putin and Trump. For domestic reasons, the US president has since left office in January 2017 away from Russia, after Clinton called him in the Putin puppet campaign. In fact, it seems that the otherwise impulsive president in Russia's politics should be stifling so as not to feed the judicial investigations against his campaign team because of the "Russian connection". As a result, observers have interpreted its attack on Germany 's so – called "total" gas – dependent summit at NATO' s summit as a possible attempt by Trump to protect himself from criticism. a rapprochement with Putin in Helsinki
recently shown in the case of Russia. Unexpectedly, at the G-7 summit in early June, he suggested that Moscow be included again in the circle of major economies, for which he was immediately criticized by German Chancellor Angela Merkel. It is quite possible that Trump renews his proposal in Helsinki. It would be appropriate, however, that Russia's entry into the G-7 group took place in 1997 at a summit of Presidents Bill Clinton and Boris Yeltsin in Finland.
Source link
