[ad_1]
On Wednesday, two suspected jihadists were convicted of the Straflandsgericht in Graz for terrorist organization, criminal organization and establishment of an anti-state relationship. A 38-year-old man who allegedly recruited members for the Islamic State terrorist organization has become an eight-year-old, 24-year-old man who plans to launch a bomb on a USB stick for seven years.
Highest security measures
The process began under the most stringent security measures – hooded prison guards at the heavily armed Cobra – on Monday, November 27, and lasted three days. The 38-year-old Austrian should, according to the prosecutors of a radical religious club, "play a central ideological role". He was accused of persuading several people to go to Syria and join the IS group. Among them were two couples and their nine children, "who went straight to hell", as the prosecutor put it. The parents had to answer in court after their return to Graz and were sentenced.
Defendant: "Do not recognize the court"
The accused repeatedly pointed out that he would not recognize the court. Even his defender was not allowed to speak for him and so participated silently in the hearing. The defendant's default answer was "no answer". He also distanced himself from his earlier statements: "I was intimidated," he explained. An employee of the constitutional constitution has described him as the representative of an "original leadership of Islam, which rejects all democratic currents".
The case was different with the young accused. The 24-year-old Bulgarian himself went to Syria and returned in 2015. During a search, he found a USB stick containing texts on the topics "Explosive bomb science", " attack on the mobile phone "," production and use of biological weapons "or" use of electronics for military purposes ", lead poisoning and arsenic and napalm," this was a way to carry out terrorist attacks, "said the prosecutor. In addition, the accused found traces of explosive TNT (Trinitrotoluene) on the loop of the dormitory door of his men.
"Mbadively radical"
While the Prosecutor clbadified him as "radically radical," his defender called him a "curious man" who "downloaded nonsense." The bomb plans and other technical instructions were examined by an explosives expert. "These are diagrams that represent basic electrotechnical circuits, and the standard circuits have been supplemented by electronic detonators to trigger a detonation," explained the evaluator. "All circuits are fully functional," said the expert at the judge's question, whether these plans could actually make bombs.
The USB key also contained a description of how to explode an explosion with a mobile phone. "This is a manual for a remote version that works," said the expert. Another directive was the production of an explosive based on nitric acid, sulfuric acid and glycerin, as well as the production of napalm. The appraiser described the level of difficulty badociated with producing such a substance as "a normal dish, as he was cooking".
The two accused found guilty
The jury declared the two accused guilty. The 38-year-old Austrian has been in prison for eight years and the 24-year-old Bulgarian has been sentenced to seven years in prison. Both have been in detention since January 2017. The judgment is not final.
The young accused himself went to Syria and returned in 2015. He found a USB stick containing texts on "the theory of explosive bombs", "the attack on the mobile phone", " the production and use of biological weapons "or" the use of electronics for military purposes ", poisoning by lead and arsenic and napalm . "It was a way to carry out terrorist attacks," said the prosecutor. In addition, the accused found traces of explosive TNT (trinitrotoluene) on the doorbell of his room. It is said that he told a girl that he now had "the desire to cut off some heads".
While the prosecutor labeled him as "radically radical," his advocate called him a "curious man" who "downloaded nonsense." He wanted "but not to kill people", but he just wanted to clarify.
The 38-year-old repeatedly pointed out that he had "waived this court", which prevented his public defender from saying anything. It's also given little informative. "No answer" was his usual phrase. He also distanced himself from his earlier statements: "I was intimidated," he explained.
[ad_2]
Source link
