[ad_1]
Vienna . Countries want to negotiate with the federal government "on an equal footing," as they repeat the mantra. The turquoise federal government seems to have little interest. This has been shown both in the announcement to redistribute jurisdiction between the federal and state governments, as well as in the ongoing discussion about the expansion of child care services (19659002). This angered the federal states. Six of them led to a common critical opinion. The other three, as it was officially called, were too controversial (see page 2). The ten-page document that is available for the "press" is actually not delicate. He criticizes the fact that the federal government has "increasingly adopted a partnership (…) of partnership". There is no joint drafting of contracts and "unreasonably short delays". Appointments would also always be "last minute". All this – and probably many expected financial breaks – have caused "astonishment and discontent" among the countries
An Overview of Controversial Negotiating Points:
Childcare
The Guard Children is a priority for money. Family Minister Juliane Bogner-Strauß (ÖVP) has pledged to the countries 110 million euros a year in negotiations for a new agreement 15a for the expansion of childcare, support linguistics and free kindergarten. Until now, it has been a little over 140 million. This would result in a loss of 30 million euros per year over the next three years. This is unacceptable for countries.
This also applies to stricter federal requirements. From now on, countries will have to ensure that the child care rate increases by two percentage points per year. In addition, the proportion of children attending an institution consistent with a full-time job for parents is expected to increase by one percentage point each year. As a result, according to the federal government's wishes, there should be better opening hours and fewer closing days.
The Confederation also provides specific provisions for the promotion of the language in kindergarten. During a kindergarten year, the proportion of children needing language support should decrease by 40%. As a result, fewer new pupils than extraordinary pupils, who can not be clbadified because of their low German skills, will have to be clbadified in the future. This is also defined by a numeric value.
Federal states reject all these requirements, as stated in the statement, "with the aim of completely unrealistic goal." The criteria are "completely impracticable", "bureaucratized" and "not feasible." The "compulsive control instruments" were also "ineffective." What's behind it: Countries do not want to give up power.
But that's exactly what they would be forced to do.Because the federal government requires pre-extended money, if the requirements are not met, back.By stone, all this might not be Due to growing criticism, Family Minister Bogner-Strauss has shown his willingness to negotiate at some point Tuesday
.
Teacher
Ongoing negotiations between the federal government and the federal states are not limited to child care but also for the payment of teachers of the country.The federal government also liaises with the Länder here.In the future, they should dig more prof for additional teachers. This is what the Ministry of Education proposes for the so-called Landeslehrercontringing regulation.
This is not just a complicated term, it is also a complicated system. The federal government determines annually in the establishment plan the number of teachers that countries can hire. Countries may exceed this number. Additional teachers are called "over-qualified teachers". During the 2016/17 school year, for example, there were 1,600 "redundant teachers" throughout Austria. In Vorarlberg, in particular, about 500 teachers were employed more than the authorized establishment plan (see graph)
It costs something – not just the federal states, but also the federal government. He spends money for these teachers. Countries must repay it after the end of the year. But they do not do it completely. They reimburse the federal government the salary of a young teacher – according to the old law on services. In practice, however, older and therefore more expensive teachers are hired. In addition, the starting salary of a beginning teacher in the new law on services is higher. De facto, therefore, the federal government will remain on several millions of euros. In 2016/17, it was 36.9 million.
The government wants to put an end to this. Countries are here too. "Such a Junktimierung is rejected in the sense of a" quality essential content debate ", said succinctly in the statement.In general, a mix of school subjects and kindergartens should be" rejected "
The ban on the headscarf
Incidentally, child care is not only related to the provincial control of teachers, but also to the introduction of a ban on the headscarf in kindergarten.It is what countries also reject.It lies, is criticized in the country document, but not "detailed review of such regulations regarding constitutional compliance" before. furthermore, there would be questions about the "practicability and usefulness of administrative sanctions." In any case, "relevance in elementary pedagogical practice is not apparent."
C & # 39; is a severe content criticism, and obviously countries are not do not always seem to be concerned about money.
("Die Presse", printed edition, 01.08.2018)
Source link
