Drozda: Protocol of the case of the image



[ad_1]

Yesterday at 1 pm, a Belvedere restaurateur inspected and secured Kurt Kocherscheidt's In Room Inside II at the SPÖ Federal Office in Vienna. Originally, he wanted to make the director general of the SP, Thomas Drozda, after a public whirlwind about it today.

The situation is getting worse now: as indicated, the image was that of the Chancellery in June 2016 – while the Minister was Thomas Drozda. The fact that he introduced "state ownership" at party headquarters could have legal consequences.

The Federal Chancellery has put in place a thorough protocol that carries serious allegations against Drozda:

  • In the "final phase of coalition negotiations" in December 2017, a "personal badistant" from Drozda informed the Belvedere that he wished to convey the image borrowed from Parliament.

  • As a new contractual partner, the Belvedere is 11.12. 2017, announcement of Thomas Drozda. However, a valid loan agreement will never be finalized. "

  • The initial contract with the Federal Chancellery has "never changed." A direct loan to an individual is not possible ", concludes the Chancellery:" Nevertheless, the work of the BKA "was introduced in the Löwelstraße.

Chancery: "unauthorized repeated spending"

In the contract still in place with the Belvédère, it is also indicated that the transfer of the painting must be done by specialists appointed by the museum. This too, according to the Chancery, did not occur. This accuses Drozda of "repeated and unauthorized use of federal property and inappropriate use of the work" previously. In October, the Kocherscheidt – without announcement at Belvedere – was transferred to the headquarters of the SPÖ.

"The work was put on the ground." And the conclusion was clear yesterday, before the photo was collected: "The headquarters of the SPÖ is a valuable badet of the federal government, which was spent without any authorization as a photographic background." An "independent restorer". will now check "any damage". While the Chancellery remains silent about the legal consequences, the government circles report "possible prosecution".

[ad_2]
Source link