#MeTwo: The banality of racism



[ad_1]




Racism is commonplace. It's a common place for those affected because it happens so often. It is also often bbad in its expression: it can be a joke or the question: "Where do you really come from?"

In 2004, the researcher on racism Mark Terkessidis published his doctoral thesis. For her, he conducted interviews with second-generation migrants who told him about his racist experiences. The book is 14 years old, but remains up-to-date: The stories are similar to those shared by thousands of people on Twitter using the #MeTwo hashtag. Terkessidis called the book "The bbadity of racism."

Talking about racism is difficult. Many who hear the word think of the badbadinations of the "national-socialist clandestine", the burning houses of refugees, the Nazis and their crimes. The charge of racism is automatically followed by indignant rejection: "I am not racist". And that ends the debate

. It's the same with the resignation of Mesut Özil. Granted: Ironically, with the president of the DFB, Reinhard Grindel, whom he criticized most harshly, he does not make the charge of racism concrete. Özil even pulled a quote from the year 2004, in which Grindel expressed his opposition to multiculturalism. This facilitated the task of the DFB

. The declarations of the federation and its president are no less symptomatic. The fact that the DFB is badociated with racism is clearly recalled, says the message. Grindel also rejected the accusation "decidedly".

Racism is shrinking, even with respect to diversity within its own ranks. To summarize, anyone who plays football of Turkish origin is primarily a critic. Look, we have people from immigration, we can not be racist at all.

It's as simple as fake.

The integration commissioner of the DFB, Cacau, also decided not to argue seriously. "We have the feeling that if we see the news and that we read that Germany has a national problem of racism, it is not the case," he said. at the ARD.

Racism is a national sentiment. problem. This is not only supported by tens of thousands of reports on Twitter. Every second person from immigration has been discriminated against. This is the result of a representative study of the Federal Anti-Discrimination Agency.

Those who are "different" are affected. In the paper are examples: a respondent was called a "Negro", a woman found only a Kitaplatz, as she removed her headscarf for performance dates.

One can counter this view that they are people who do not get Kitaplatz and the people murdered by the Nazis, calling the two victims of racism.

Those who argue in this way do not understand how ideology works: it starts by thinking in terms of the alleged differences in biology, culture or origin. And even if there are such differences, those who want to fight racism seriously must question this way of thinking.

Resolving Spasm

To do this, we have to solve the cramps badociated with the word-R. We all derive from what the scientist calls Terkessidis "racist knowledge". By this he means prejudices about groups that seem familiar to all those who intertwine in a narrative that almost no one can resist: when a Russian-born boyfriend once told me about a party of family, I automatically imagined that she was vodka. drank full glbades, like water.

The fact that Germans with roots abroad also have prejudices does not change the fact that the vast majority of jobs, apartments and grades are given by people without a migratory background. They have the power to put resentment into action. Of course, this does not mean that migrants are free from resentment.

None of us are exempt from it. It does not matter if you are caught up in racist thought patterns. Bad is reflexive rejection. Racism does not disappear by denying it.

[ad_2]
Source link