Official: 31 years without dual nationality – salzburg.ORF.at



[ad_1]

Flachgauerin, aged 31, who should be giving her Austrian citizenship because of an alleged dual Turkish nationality, is Austrian. The state of Salzburg has now officially established that.

After several weeks of anxiety, Cigdem Schiller can now breathe a sigh of relief: the Land of Salzburg has informed her that she will not be deprived of Austrian nationality. "If it had been different, it would have cost me six months more nerves, I could not have done it anymore, and now I'm very happy that it's over and I can continue my usual life." "said Flachgauerin, 31, relieved.

Authorities submitted new documents

Thanks to the new documents of the Turkish Consulate, she was able to prove to the Salzburg authorities that she was not a Turkish citizen. "It is said that in 2003, my parents and my siblings from the Turkish state went offline and left with us.This mistake has now been corrected," says Schiller.

Schiller had been trying for more than six months to prove that she did not have dual nationality. She was born in Austria and has Turkish parents. She had already obtained her Turkish citizenship in 2003. Her name is still on the Turkish voters list. This is why the country launched a process of deprivation of citizenship – more on this in the debate over dual Austro-Turkish citizenship (salzburg.ORF.at, 18.10.2018).

No country comment

The country has now terminated the withdrawal procedure, but did not want to comment on the case for data protection reasons. Nationally, however, a possible dual nationality is being revised in 500 other cases. The Turkish electoral lists published a few months ago are the starting point.

Revolutionary decision of VwGH

In mid-October, the Administrative Court (VwGH) confirmed the loss of Austrian citizenship for a Turkish-Austrian dual citizen. The man living in Tennengau had appealed a decision of the Administrative Court of the State of Salzburg.

The state administrative court has again upheld a decision of the state government. The country's decision was based on a list of Turkish electoral evidence presented by the Ministry of the Interior for the Turkish Consulate General's office in Salzburg.

As part of the evaluation of the evidence, the Landesverwaltungsgericht stated that a single Turkish authority could create such a list of 29 602 data records, so this list was a Turkish electoral register. For a new accidental "unsolicited" presentation, there is no proof either. The VwGH has joined this point of view.

connections:

[ad_2]
Source link