The call for AfD observation in Germany is stronger

The announcement of an internal report containing recommendations for action to the AFD has further fueled the debate over a German party's control by protecting the constitution.

The recommendation of an evaluator to give up terms such as "Überfremdung" and "Umvolkung" to avoid an observation of intelligence does not change the fact that the party should be observed, said today the "Handelsblatt ", politician of the CDU Patrick Sensburg. "The fact that the AfD wants to exchange terms shows that he now wants to cheat on his real content, just to avoid observation."

Expertise to escape the observation

Yesterday, it was common knowledge that the legal badyst appointed by the AfD Dietrich Murswiek urgently warns the party against the use of certain terms, which could constitute evidence to be observed by the protection of the Constitution.

From the point of view of the Green Konstantin von Notz parliamentary group, AFD officials describe the report as an "extreme radicalization" of the party. "With the self-produced list of anti-constitutionality symptoms, the party seems to self-diagnose that the AfD is constitutionally lost," said von Notz, the "Handelsblatt."

SPD for AfD observation

Deputy Chairman of the SPD, Ralf Stegner, called in the same document the AFD observation, as it "actively fought the fundamental rights and fundamental values ​​of our liberal constitutional order". The report only proves "the powerless attempt of party leaders to deny this fact and to conceal its own undemocratic political goals."

Konstantin Kuhle, an interior politician of the FDP, told the newspaper: "It's whimsical to say that self-proclaimed advocates of freedom of expression and freedom of expression want to muzzle themselves to conceal their political intentions and evade the observation of constitutional protection ".