[ad_1]
On November 20, 2018, an administrative court in Kiev dismissed Peter Seisenbacher 's appeal, lodged at the beginning of the year in the context of a negative asylum decision. The decision, published Thursday in the register of Ukrainian courts, is not final. The ex-Austrian athlete can appeal within 30 days.
As announced by the verdict, the authority in charge of migration in Oblast (administrative district, note) of Kiev had already rejected, on November 2, 2017, an asylum application from the former Judokas. Seisenbachers' application was manifestly unfounded, as there was no reasonable apprehension that it could be prosecuted for ethnic, religious, social or political reasons, was the competent authority.
Objection not treated further
The Austrian's lawyer then appealed the negative asylum decision, but this request was not settled due to a short period of time. On January 30, 2018, the authority of the migration informed the Austrian of this fact. Seisenbacher's now rejected appeal referred to the migration authority's refusal to deal with the late objection.
The athlete sees himself in Austria exposed to political persecutions: "The Austrian authorities are not able to protect Seisenbacher from human rights violations because they themselves are the agents of his illegal prosecution" , said the court in a statement of the former Judokas "psychological violence" by the media. He justified his escape from Austria by a preliminary conviction related to criminal charges, which he had influenced. "I fled because I could not hope for a fair trial," said the Kiev court.
abuse
The Attorney General's office in Vienna accuses ex-sportsmen of abuses committed against minors between 1997 and 2004, it is the presumption of innocence. Since the offending offenses are already prescribed by Ukrainian law, the Austrian judiciary in 2017 had tried in vain to extradite. At the same time, after validation of his pbadports, Seisenbacher can only go to Austria with the support of the Austrian Embbady in Kiev, where a trial in Vienna-Strafland Court will be held. 39; expect.
What will happen to Seisenbacher in Ukraine is not clear yet. His lawyer, Serhij Koschelnyk, who had missed the announcement of the court's decision last week, did not want to make a statement to APA on Thursday. Apart from a negative asylum decision, there is an absolute obligation to leave the country since autumn 2017, according to the decisions of the public courts. Seisenbacher's appeal against this decision by the immigration authorities failed at the end of September, his lawyer having refrained from several hearings before the Pechersk District Court in Kiev.
[ad_2]
Source link