Nine states of the United States are trying to stop the "new era"



[ad_1]

The American Defense Distributed NGO, which defends the right to freedom of information, once again exposed plans for the printing of weapons on 3D printers. Since August 1, 2018, it was perfectly legitimate to share such documents, but several US states have already begun to fight against the drawings

  Photo: Reuters "border =" 0 "data-x-height =" 790 "data -x-src = "https://img.tyt.by/n/reuters/0c/0/rtr3oa4z_3d_printed_firearms.jpg" data-x-width = "1200" data-y-height = "474" data-y- src = "https: / /img.tyt.by/720x720s/n/reuters/0c/0/rtr3oa4z_3d_printed_firearms.jpg" data-y-width = "720" zoom-data = "1" height = "474" hspace = "0" src = "https://img.tyt.by/720x720s/n/reuters/0c/0/rtr3oa4z_3d_printed_firearms.jpg" title = "Photo: Reuters" vspace = "0" width = "720" />

 
<figcaption> Photo: Reuters </figcaption></figure>
<p>  Distributed Defense is a networked organization specializing in the development of firearms, whose components can be printed on a 3D printer. The organization released drawings for the creation of nine weapon models as early as Friday, July 27, and since then they have been downloaded by several thousand people </p>
<p>  At the time of writing, the Defense Distributed site was working with restrictions, many references were not available. . Distributed Defense over the past five years has been challenged the ban on the publication of drawings of pistols for 3D printers and finally by the end of June 2018 unexpectedly reached its: the restriction is lifted on August 1. </p>
<p>  But on Monday, July 30, nine states filed a lawsuit against the US President Donald Trump, as well as the Defense Distributed Organization and Foundation "Second Amendment to the Constitution" to ban free distribution weapon designs for 3D printers. The second Constitutional Amendment Fund is the same plaintiff who sued the US State Department and won, making it legitimate to publish hand-made pistol designs. </p>
<p>  US President Trump has already <a href= written on Twitter that

The controversy surrounding the 3D printed weapon began in 2012, when the American Cody Wilson, who is made call cryptoanarchist, printed for the first time on a printer a pistol called Liberator. This simple firearm contains virtually no metal parts and can fire only once.

Subsequently, instructions for the printing of such weapons were published on the Defense Distributed website, managed by Wilson. They have been downloaded hundreds of thousands of times. Now, the organization promises not only to provide instructions for three-dimensional printers, but also sells parts for artisbad weapons. The company also released the Ghost Gunner automatic milling machine, which allows you to independently bademble a firearm based on a legally purchased white without a serial number

The US State Department ordered the removal of # 39; Internet on the creation of weapons on 3D printers. and achieved his goal. Then a legal battle ensued, which lasted four years.

US law prohibits the sale of weapons without serial numbers, but its manufacture is not prohibited. There is one important exception: a hand-held gun should contain enough metal to be recognized by metal detectors. In the case of plastic weapons, this prohibition is avoided by the addition of a metal part easy to remove

Demonstration of Prosecutors

In July 2018, Distributed Defense unexpectedly obtained the Permission to publish plans for the manufacture of weapons

lawmakers, and Monday the Washington State Attorney Bob Ferguson said that he will file a complaint with prosecutors from eight other states against the State Department to prohibit the illegal distribution of weapons for 3D printers. 9659004] "The weapons available for download are not saved anywhere, it is difficult to detect even when using metal detectors.It is available to everyone, regardless of age, mental health and conviction, "said Ferguson

. "We, as leaders of the law enforcement system of our states, are convinced that the proposed conditions and rules are very dangerous and can have an unprecedented impact on public security," the letter said. "They will simplify access to weapons not only for terrorists and international criminals, but also for people banned from possessing weapons by federal and state laws."

Cody Wilson claims that his victory in the courts opened the era of downloaded weapons. 19659004] Opponents of the decision point to the likelihood of a dramatic increase in the number of "invisible weapons" – unregistered guns, which law enforcement agencies ignore. existence and therefore can not follow them. (window ._fbq = []); if (! _fbq.loaded) {var fbds = document.createElement (& # 39; script); fbds.async = true; fbds.src = "http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbds.js"; var s = document.getElementsByTagName (& # 39; script & # 39;) [0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore (fbds, s); _fbq.loaded = true;}; _fbq.push ([‘addPixelId’,’644378592349624′]);}) (); window._fbq = window._fbq || []; window._fbq.push ([‘track’,’PixelInitialized’,{}]); [ad_2]
Source link