The Supreme Court on the reduction of terms for "narcotics" articles: "Today, we do not see objective conditions for mitigation"



[ad_1]

Valery Kalinkovich stated that he was ready to discuss the topic of criminal liability for the use of narcotics for commercial purposes. But, according to him, the Supreme Court does not see the preconditions for the reduction of liability for illegal actions committed for marketing purposes.

I am ready to discuss criminal liability for unlawful actions with non-profit narcotics . – There, in a number of cases, the crime is next to a big problem, visiting the addict himself, his family, his family, his friends and all the others around him. Of course, criminal responsibility as such must be one of the possible tools to start fighting a disease, to overcome it if possible and to return to society as a normal member.

As with all matters relating to illicit drug trafficking, we do not see any objective pre-conditions today to mitigate liability for illegal actions with narcotics for marketing purposes. These are dangerous crimes. It's actually the spread of death.

We have published on our Internet resources the results of the examination of one of the cases of the crime provided for in Part 5 of Article 328 of the Penal Code. When, as a result of marketing a single dose of methadone, a person used, he died immediately. Therefore, everything related to the sale of drugs … I see no prospect of mitigation of responsibilities. The law in the current wording, taking into account the measures taken, objectively contributes to the improvement of the criminal situation in this area. This is not only our badessment, it is evaluation and a number of international experts. To date, drugs on the territory of Belarus are among the most expensive in the region, and it is also one of the indicators of the effectiveness of the fight against this phenomenon. The more expensive the dose, the harder it is for the consumer to use it

– Article 328 sentenced mothers often complain that people often do not know each other and are reduced to one. general group, how can this be commented on? 19659006] – The journalists asked the question …

– As for Article 328, I do not quite understand the question, there are specific accusations, and the verdict renders a legal decision, said the vice president. – Today, it is no secret that the distribution of narcotics is done using the same Internet resources, using bookmarks, etc., this does not imply in any way. principle a direct personal knowledge of distributors who are in the same chain. In many cases, consumers do not observe sellers personally. Unfortunately, today, crime, especially organized, very quickly perceives for its purposes all the achievements of the scientific and technical process. Therefore, it is necessary to talk about this problem considering modern technologies in particular. With regard to the court decisions handed down on specific criminal cases, we have not yet refused to accept the duly presented complaint and its objective examination. In situations where we come to the conclusion that the judgment is false, it is adjusted accordingly. No installation, preset, and even more given algorithms, who judge and who to justify, could not and could not be.

(to be completed)

[ad_2]
Source link