[ad_1]
Journalists have published a fake cancer study as part of an extensive survey of unscrupulous publications in a little-known scientific journal, Le Monde reported on Thursday.
The purpose of the investigation was to show that anyone, on condition that could pay could pbad " False Science " for true
Journalists from two German media outlets, the daily Süddeutsche Zeitung and the public radio NDR, reported to the journal Journal of Integrative Oncology " the results of a clinical study showing that propolis extract was more effective in colorectal cancer than conventional chemotherapy "
Propolis is a resinous substance derived from trees and transformed by bees to build the cells of their hives.
" The study was fictional, fabricated data, and authors, affiliated with an imaginary research institute, did not exist either, but the publication was accepted in less than ten days and published on April 24, "explained Le Monde.
The daily's website offers a link to an archived version of this study, which was withdrawn after the review was notified.
It states that the researchers compared the effectiveness of the study. chemotherapy with propolis capsules. Moreover, the conclusion of pseudo scientific article speaks of an unrelated subject, the effect of mbadage on thromboembolic diseases.
German Research Minister Anja Karliczek expressed support for a investigation to determine why this false study was published.
" the interest of science itself "she said, quoted by the German news agency DPA. According to her, everything must be implemented " so that credibility and confidence in science are not affected (…) It is good that such errors are brought to light, because only in this way can we change what is wrong ".
The magazine in question is published by an Indian publisher, Omics
But according to Le Monde, it is "dozens of unscrupulous publishers" who "have created hundreds of journals open access to the name snoring, having all the finery of real scholarly journals ". They touch on a multitude of scientific disciplines.
Without no control on the quality of the presented works, they claim to the authors " some hundreds of euros " by article , according to Le Monde and NDR.
In the most prestigious journals, where to publish requires review by expert scientists of the same field ( " Peer Review " ), and where the process of validation usually takes several months, the authors do not always pay.
A journalist from NDR also told on-air improvise, with a colleague, a computer scientist through a fake website university and false references to scientific articles. Both even intervened in a conference where they " received a prize at the end ".
[ad_2]
Source link
