Black Bomb: Unexplained Space Forms Are "Evidence of the Past Universe" | Science | New



[ad_1]

Space scientists claim that strange points, spotted in the primitive universe, seem to be sources of large amounts of information. The reasons why these strange parts of deep space behave in such a mysterious way remain obscure – but researchers claim that these energetic zones could be the consequence of "compliant cyclic cosmology" (CCC), a theory suggesting that our universe existed in another form. And these cosmic zones could have formed from black holes, the researchers said.

These swirling areas unexplained in the sky could even be the remains of another universe.

Professor Sir Roger Penrose, a physicist and mathematician from the Oxford Universe and one of the authors of the study, told New Scientist: "What we claim to see, is the last remnant after a black hole evaporated during the previous period. "

If the universe undergoes continual contractions and expansions, all of the previous universe is probably destroyed each time, nothing surviving in the next.

But the latest study suggests that black holes from the previous universe might actually spit out what is called Hawking radiation, named after the legendary scientist, Professor Stephen Hawking.

READ MORE: Astronomers are spying a black hole swallowing the neuton star

And this radiation could survive from one iteration of the universe to the next.

Areas where electromagnetic radiation was particularly high – called Hawking points – could be remnants of the previous universe.

These abnormal points could therefore be explained by this CCC theory.

This describes these mysteriously incandescent dots as the final "evaporation" of the supermassive black holes existing in the version of a universe prior to this one.

However, many scientists oppose the idea of ​​the cyclical universe and the Hawking radiation remains to be confirmed.

READ MORE: A rogue black hole unleashes the milky way

Scientists say they hope their analysis will provide "a significant initial indication of the nature of these anomalous regions and will make a significant new contribution to cosmology, no matter how valid CCC is".

The researchers conclude by suggesting that their study poses a significant problem for conventional understanding of the universe, regardless of their background.

They wrote: "It's hard to see, however, that they find a natural explanation in the current inflationary situation."

Some other physicists, however, are still not convinced. Professor James Zibin of the University of British Columbia notes that scientists have been examining microwave cosmic microwave background (CMB) for years and found no evidence of particularly hot spots.

He thinks that Professor Penrose and his colleagues did not consider the effect of "looking elsewhere".

READ MORE: How does the Starship compare to NASA's powerful Saturn V?

He argued that because they had found the hottest points in the actual as opposed to simulated data in only two out of 40 tests, the odds of being a victim of a statistical blow had dropped from one in 1000 to one in 50.

Professor Douglas Scott, also at the University of British Columbia, is also skeptical.

Describing the document as "very confusing and hard to follow," he is wary of what he sees as a potentially perpetual series of attempts to find unusual features in the CMB.

He said: "Obviously, if anyone could show that a specific pattern on the microwave sky proved that the universe had undergone a series of cycles, it would be really exciting.

"But this paper is well below that."

READ MORE: NASA wants you to submit a song for Moon's future missions

[ad_2]

Source link