[ad_1]
The Court of Appeal ruled in favor of Zion Christian Church (ZCC) and its leader, Bishop Barnabas Edward Lekganyane, about a disciplinary hearing involving eleven members of the church. [19659003] In dismissing the High Court's decision that church members were entitled to a ban while waiting for the church and its head to listen and respond to their grievances, the court of Appeal stated that the members' file was unfounded
may argue that they had the right not to be summoned to a disciplinary hearing the outcome of which would be determined by evidence. It is clear that the nature of the evidence that would be produced was and remains unknown, "reads in part.
The seventeen members of the ZCC (respondents in the case) had, in December 2015, filed a church seeking an order to prohibit and detain him, and his leader, Bishop Lekganyane, to hold disciplinary hearings against eleven of the members mentioned.
They were to be heard in November 2015, but instead they asked, among other things,
By a successful application to the High Court, they further wanted the church and Lekganyane to address the issue. firstly, their grievances that they had filed in April of the previous year, 2014.
They actually did They expressed the fear that if they would appear in the disciplinary court, they would be convicted and expelled from the church.
However, the court of appeal noted that their case lacked the fear of injury or irreparable harm: "The law is that apprehension must be reasonable. In this case, the fears are only speculative.In addition, it should be noted that even if their fears could come to fruition and that they were illegally expelled from the church, they would still have others. ways to bring the case before other church structures on appeal and, if they failed, seek judicial review 19659010]
[ad_2]
Source link
