[ad_1]
National review
House Republicans question Pelosi’s security decisions leading to the Capitol riots
House Republicans on Monday called on Speaker Nancy Pelosi to answer “many important questions” about her “responsibility for the security” of the U.S. Capitol on January 6, when a pro-Trump mob stormed the building. Republicans on several committees sent Pelosi a letter asking why, among other things, former Capitol Police Chief Steve Sund had his Jan. 4 request for National Guard assistance rejected by former Staff Sgt. arms Paul Irving, according to Fox News. Irving reportedly said he was concerned with “the optics” and didn’t think “the intelligence was backing him.” “As you know, the Speaker of the House is not only the leader of the majority party, but he also has enormous institutional responsibilities,” said the letter, written by Rodney Davis, a ranking committee member of House Administration, Jim Jordan, Ranking Member of the House Judiciary Committee. , Ranking Member of the House Oversight Committee James Comer and Ranking Member of the House Intelligence Committee, Devin Nunes. “The Speaker is responsible for all operational decisions made in the House,” the letter said, adding that Pelosi, his staff and an army of appointed officials in the House had maintained a “very stern and tightly controlled approach to operations. the House ‘on for two years. “When then Chief Sund applied for National Guard support on January 4, why was that request denied?” the group wrote. “Did Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving get permission or instructions from your staff on January 4 before denying Chief Sund’s request for the National Guard? The letter added that on the day of the Capitol Riots, Sund decided to inform the Sergeant-at-Arms of his request for National Guard assistance and said it had “taken over an hour for his request to be made. be approved because the SAA had to fulfill the request. the chain of command. This channel “undoubtedly included” Pelosi and his “delegates”, say the Republicans. They criticize Pelosi for his “partisan” decision to “unilaterally” fire Irving and demand Sund’s resignation. While Pelosi said on Jan. 7 that she called for Sund’s resignation because he “hasn’t called us since it happened,” Republicans say that claim was “refuted” by Sund, who “detailed twice where he briefed you on the situation. on the Capitol campus – the first at 5:36 pm and the second at 6:25 pm, both on January 6.” Davis, Jordan, Comer and Nunes also questioned the reliability of the independent security review conducted by General Russell Honoré, whom Pelosi appointed alone last month “without consulting the minority.” They expressed concern that House officials rejected requests for “information collection and retention” on Pelosi’s behalf. “Such information is necessary to properly conduct surveillance on the events of January 6,” they say in their letter. “Requests for retention and production were sent to SAA and the head of administration. stration of the House, among other legislative bodies, requesting that such relevant information regarding the attack on Capitol Hill, including correspondence, video footage, audio recordings and other documents, be retained and produced to the relevant committees. “In several cases, your appointees, acting on your behalf, have refused requests for the production of this information,” the Republicans add. “The response we received was: ‘We regret to inform you that given the extent of the information requested and the concerns implied by the nature of the request… we are unable to meet the request. for now. ”The group says they learned that“ some of the documents we requested were provided to the House Judiciary Committee on a partisan basis ”. “This is unacceptable. Madam President, this direction could only come from you,” they wrote.
[ad_2]
Source link