The court decides the fate of the chief of bribe of KAT-Blagoevgrad, is released if … – BLITZ



[ad_1]

The Blagoevgrad District Court awarded a security of 10,000 leva to the Chief of Traffic Police – Blagoevgrad, st. Danail Stoitzov. This lawyer accused Ivan Cholakov after the meeting today, quoted by FOCUS. Danail Stoicov remains in detention at the moment. Within three days, the defense or the prosecution can appeal the wrongful appeal.

After the expiry of the time limit, it will become clear whether the Stoitzov family accepts the guarantee, explained lawyer Cholakov

following the specialized action of the domestic security and security sector. Special Prosecutor's Office of the Blagoevgrad Traffic Police. May 22 were charged with three people

One was Danail Stoitzov, head of the Traffic Police Department at ODMWR – Blagoevgrad, charged with four crimes – bribery, office use, illegal possession weapons to fire and exceeded their rights by providing a police escort for heavy truck traffic with oversized equipment. Ст. Insp. Stoicov is detained until then, and on June 5, 2018, the Sofia Court of Appeal decides to remain in detention. Another accused is Boyko Sharkov

His accusation is a bribe in which he participated as an badistant, he deliberately helped the accused Danail Stoitzov to demand and receive a pot-of-wine -Ven different people. Boyko Sharkov is released with a monetary guarantee in the amount of BGN 7,000 The third defendant is Nikola Doganjiyski, who, according to the prosecution, deliberately facilitated the proceedings.

It created conditions to find people wishing to register and identify road vehicles both in the city of Blagoevgrad and at the PCP registration points in the city of Blagoevgrad – Petrich and UK – Gotse Delchev. In violation of the established rules, the vehicle registration numbers and trailers pulled by them were provided with a combination of optional numbers. Nicholas Doganjiyski held meetings and negotiations personally involved in them, as well as negotiating the amount of bribe. The third defendant has a certain monetary guarantee of $ 6,000

[ad_2]
Source link