[ad_1]
The Constitutional Court's decision on the Istanbul Convention is the worst decision in its entire history, NGOs write in an open letter to the media.
Earlier, the CC announced today the Istanbul Convention as unconstitutional. "The decision is legally incompetent to the point that it creates an internal concern and only the reader is relatively familiar with European law"
"According to the decision, ratification of the Convention would mean" society [да] has lost the ability to distinguish "According to the" men "of the Constitutional Court, the continued possibility of impunity of men against women is what will preserve the ability of society to distinguish between a woman and a man. it is a woman who was born to be abused, and "the man" is a man born of violence, and after the decision of today we remain in this society since the early, "he writes
The post was signed by the Gender Alternatives Foundation, the NIA Association, the Center for Women's Studies and Policies, the Foundation for Our Children, the Bulgarian Helsinki Committee, Velina Todorova, Member of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, Bulgarian Association for Family Planning and Sexual Health, Foundation for Gender Education Research and Technology, Bulgarian Center for Non-profit Law, Center Open Door Center, Association of Dynamics Center, Marginalia Human Rights Association, Bulgarian Foundation for Lawyers for Human Rights and Lale Foundation
Here is the full text of the position of non-governmental organizations:
Decision No. 13/201 8 of today's Constitutional Court, according to which the Istanbul Convention is not in accordance with the Constitution, is a shame for Bulgaria. It is legally flawed by the gross misunderstandings of non-professors, but as a social philosophy – social, philosophical, homophobic. As a state gesture, it is a retrograde and obstinate personality
The decision is legally incompetent to the point that it creates an internal concern and that only the reader knows relatively good European law. According to this ignorant, unethical decision, there was a "clear link between the Council of Europe's policy on preventing and combating violence against women as a form of discrimination based on on bad and the protection of transgender people ". The Council of Europe has treated "discrimination based on" gender identity "as a form of discrimination against women."
It's wrong. There is no such connection. The Gender Council Acts of the Council of Europe [1] mentioned in the decision itself deal exclusively with "badual orientation" and "gender identity" and do not even mention women and discrimination based on gender. In this sense, the decision, which directly declares legal forgeries, is intellectually dishonest.
The decision in an unforgivable way confuses two fundamentally different legal terms, without any justification in their law attributing non-existent links. "Gender identity" and "gender" are in fact not close but opposed concepts. The first refers to the inner perception of the individual of his bad, regardless of the medical bad that was badigned to him at birth. The second term, on the other hand, refers to the notion of society as "woman" and "man" regardless of their actual biological situation. A "gender identity" is the personal perception of a person born with a dissonance between physical and psychological bad, and for the determinant "social gender", the public stereotype about the qualities of the person who are not related to his biological bad. For example, the majority in the Constitutional Court, ruling on the shameful decision of today, are men, but their act is not common with the public perception of a "deed" male".
The Court manipulates the two interconnected opposing concepts to fabricate a risk has been ratified, each arbitrarily and indiscriminately to be defined by bad. Such "reflections" show a resolution at the street level and shame the institutionality, state and name of Bulgaria.
The decision is a provincial self-esteem, fatal. This allows us to criticize the Convention of a position of supremacy by baderting that it was "manifestly" "internally contradictory" and that it did not correspond to its purpose and name, the reader wondering who are these uneducated individuals, editors of the international law enforcement organization of the Council of Europe, which includes 47 countries, and think that they better understand the development integrated international instruments
Domestic controversies, according to the Convention, to date, It directly states that the biological female gender is identical to the social role of a mother giving birth, a midwife and other things of the same kind. According to the "men" of the Constitutional Court, the woman is to give birth to children and be what society tells her – first of all, victim of coercion and violence
According to the astonishing retrograde decision, the Constitution does not imply "equal treatment of both bades, but requires the consideration of biological characteristics and differences between them. "There were" two opposite bades, each one carrying specific biological and social functions and responsibilities. "In other words, biological men, because they have penises, are legitimately privileged. Convention tries to change and the Bulgarian Constitutional Court maintains
According to the decision, the ratification of the Convention would mean "the society [да] lost the capacity to make a distinction between the woman and the man". "Men" of the Constitutional Court, the continued desirability of unpunished male violence against women is what will preserve the ability of society to distinguish between a woman and a man
Perhaps this is really a "Woman" according to the public concept ", born to be badaulted, and" man "is a man born of violence, and we, after the decision of today, will remain in this society in the future [19659016]
[ad_2]
Source link
